Dana Desa dan Status Desa di Provinsi Jawa Tengah

Abstract

Village Funds and Village Status in Central Java Province
 Year 2019 is the fifth year of implementation of village fund in Indonesia. At the beginning of its implementation in 2015, village funds were budgeted at IDR 20.8 trillion, which has increased to 3.5 times and reaching about IDR 70 trillion in 2019. This research is aimed to describe village funds and villages status in Central Java Province and the relationship between them. Data to be used are secondary data consisting of village funds and village status according to IDM year 2018 and 2019 in Central Java Province. The analyses used in this research are descriptive statistics and simple regression. Results show that village funds in Central Java Province increase about 14.7% in 2019 and there is an increase in the aggregate of village status. Regression analysis showed that changes in the amount of village funds did not significantly affect the change of village status in Central Java Province.

Modeling and Implementation of the Village Secretary Accounting Information System based on BPMN

“…Previous research in Central Java Province showed that in 2019 there was a 3.5-fold increase in village funds and the results of the study with regression analysis showed that changes in the amount of the Village Fund budget had no significant effect on changes in village status in Central Java Province (Yulitasari & Tyas, 2020). Previous research in Cibuaya Village, Karawang Regency, revealed that there were obstacles to understanding and implementing regulations, and an error occurred in examining the allocation of funding sources in the implementation of Direct Cash Assistance (BLT) during the Covid-19 Pandemic (Noviyanti et al, 2022).…”

Village Development: Effect of Vilage Fund and Village Head Education

“…Of the two indices, the government often uses the IDM because IDM includes 22 variables and 52 indicators designed in a synergy between economic, social, and ecological aspects that will capture the potential and ability of the village to meet village needs so that welfare can be achieved. Thus, IDM describes the village's status more because of its completeness and up-to-date (Supriadi, 2021;Yulitasari & Tyas, 2020).…”

“…The education level is one factor that affects the ability of the village apparatus (Rodiyah et al, 2021). The educational support of the village head also has a significant (Gani et al, 2020;Arina et al, 2021;Ramly et al, 2019;Tambunan et al, 2020;Yulitasari & Tyas, 2020), but the research has a level of significance different. One of the results that were not significant was the research by Yulitasari & Tyas (2020) in all districts/cities in Central Java Province in 2018-2019, which found that changes in the amount of Village Funds did not significantly affect changes in village status.…”

“…The educational support of the village head also has a significant (Gani et al, 2020;Arina et al, 2021;Ramly et al, 2019;Tambunan et al, 2020;Yulitasari & Tyas, 2020), but the research has a level of significance different. One of the results that were not significant was the research by Yulitasari & Tyas (2020) in all districts/cities in Central Java Province in 2018-2019, which found that changes in the amount of Village Funds did not significantly affect changes in village status. This insignificant result of the Village Fund is due to using a practical design on the variable distribution of Village Fund changes in Central Java Province so that it does not experience significant changes between 2018-2019.…”

“…As previously noted, managing funds for considerable village autonomy for each village requires human resources, which cannot be separated from the vital role of the village apparatus, especially the village head. Managing Village Fund requires village heads with adequate capacity (Latifah & Aziz, 2016;Yulitasari & Tyas, 2020). Village Fund problems are often found because there are still many villages where the village head and his staff are not yet qualified (Soleh et al, 2017).…”