2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DArTSeq SNP-based markers revealed high genetic diversity and structured population in Ethiopian cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] germplasms

Abstract: Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] is one of the important climate-resilient legume crops for food and nutrition security in sub-Saharan Africa. Ethiopia is believed to harbor high cowpea genetic diversity, but this has not yet been efficiently characterized and exploited in breeding. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent and pattern of genetic diversity in 357 cowpea accestions comprising landraces (87%), breeding lines (11%) and released varieties (2%), using single nucleotide polymorphism… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(93 reference statements)
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STRUCTURE, UPGMA clustering, and Discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) or PCoA; consistently recovered the same seven groups. The consistency of grouping using these methods has also been observed in earlier studies on different crop species (Tascioglu et al, 2016;Ya et al, 2017;Ketema et al, 2020). The differentiation of the population into different subpopulations by fastSTRUCTURE is based on frequencies of relatedness of the genotypes to each of the subpopulations as hypothesized (Nielsen et al, 2014;Chao et al, 2010).…”
Section: Partitioning Genetic Diversity and Population Structuresupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…STRUCTURE, UPGMA clustering, and Discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) or PCoA; consistently recovered the same seven groups. The consistency of grouping using these methods has also been observed in earlier studies on different crop species (Tascioglu et al, 2016;Ya et al, 2017;Ketema et al, 2020). The differentiation of the population into different subpopulations by fastSTRUCTURE is based on frequencies of relatedness of the genotypes to each of the subpopulations as hypothesized (Nielsen et al, 2014;Chao et al, 2010).…”
Section: Partitioning Genetic Diversity and Population Structuresupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Bar plots were generated with average results of runs for the most probable K value, using DISTRUCT v.1.1 (Rosenberg, 2004). As suggested in Ketema et al (2020) genotype was considered to belong to a group if its membership coe cient was > 0.70. Genotypes with membership coe cient less than 0.70 at each assigned K were regarded as admixed.…”
Section: Population Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of genetic diversity in crop germplasm is essential for successful crop improvement (Varshney et al, 2007). In cowpea, the genetic diversity of different germplasm collections in Ghana, China, the United States, Korea, and Ethiopia has been evaluated using different SNP markers (Egbadzor et al, 2014; Ketema et al, 2020; Muňoz‐Amatriaín et al, 2017; Seo et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2017). Most studies aimed to evaluate the extent and pattern of genetic diversity in their own research collections and developed core collections as subsets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this may require more high-density genome wide markers [33].Differences were observed between the DAPC and Structure analysis in the size of the subgroups which can be attributed to the presence of admixed individuals in the population. Thirty-one (31) accessions were in admixture when the cut-off value of coe cient ancestry was set at 0.52, and this number could increase with higher thresholds, a factor that leads to discrepancies in the results of these analyses [34,35].…”
Section: Population Structure and Relationships Between Accessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%