2013
DOI: 10.1177/1473871613504102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data and dimension reduction for visual financial performance analysis

Abstract: This article assesses the suitability of data and dimension reduction methods, and data-dimension reduction combinations, for visual financial performance analysis. Motivated by no comparable quantitative measure of all aspects of dimension reductions, this article attempts to capture the suitability of methods for the task through a qualitative comparison and illustrative experiments. While the discussion deals with differences of data-dimension reduction combinations in terms of their properties, the experim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think that this has restricted researchers from acquiring detailed information for researching and evaluating the performance of the applied algorithms on various Financial data sets. In this context, it is worth mentioning that Sarlin [Sar15] provides good experimental comparison results among dimensional and data reduction algorithms applied to Financial data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think that this has restricted researchers from acquiring detailed information for researching and evaluating the performance of the applied algorithms on various Financial data sets. In this context, it is worth mentioning that Sarlin [Sar15] provides good experimental comparison results among dimensional and data reduction algorithms applied to Financial data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of different clustering techniques available, including partitioning techniques (e.g., k-means), modelbased techniques (e.g., SOMs), hierarchical techniques (e.g., Ward's method), density-based and grid-based techniques (Han and Kamber, 2001;Wu et al, 2008;Cavélius, 2011). In this study, we adopt the SOM for the following reasons: 1) the SOM is a very visual and managerially-oriented method for the analysis of multidimensional data (Eklund et al, 2008;Länsiluoto and Eklund, 2008), 2) compared to many multidimensional visualization methods (e.g., Multidimensional Scaling, MDS), the SOM is unique in performing both projection and clustering (Vesanto, 1999;Sarlin, 2012), 3) as opposed to many traditional statistical clustering methods (such as k-means), an SOM does not require the user to specify the number of clusters beforehand, making it an ideal tool for exploratory data analysis (Wang, 2001;Wu et al, 2008), and finally, 4) an SOM is very tolerant of most forms of problematic data, including linear and non-linear relationships, skewed distributions, and erroneous or missing data (Bishop, 1995;Kohonen, 2001;Wang, 2001).…”
Section: Self-organizing Maps (Soms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) [24,25] for its dual capabilities for visual clustering; projection via neighborhood preservation and clustering via vector quantization. In [26], the SOM was shown to have a number of advantages over alternative methods for visual financial performance analysis. Conceptually, what the SOM performs is similar to what is achieved using stand-alone data and dimension reduction methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%