2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data centre day-ahead energy demand prediction and energy dispatch with solar PV integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normalized mean bias error (NMBE) and coefficient of variation of mean square error (CVRMSE) commonly used in the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Guideline 14-2014 were used to evaluate the model's errors. The calculation method is shown in Equations ( 1) and (2).…”
Section: Verification Of Data Center Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The normalized mean bias error (NMBE) and coefficient of variation of mean square error (CVRMSE) commonly used in the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Guideline 14-2014 were used to evaluate the model's errors. The calculation method is shown in Equations ( 1) and (2).…”
Section: Verification Of Data Center Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data centers are high-energy-consuming buildings. According to statistics, the data center industry accounts for 2% of the world's total energy consumption [2], and a data center's average power consumption is about 30 times that of a standard office [3]. As the number of data centers further increases, the energy consumption of data centers doubles every five years [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time series methods included different methods, such as Kalman filter, 19 Support Vector Regression (SVR), 20 Grey Forecasting Method, 21 Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), 22 and Hidden-Markov Models (HMM). 23 The learning methods comprised the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), 24,25 Support Vector Machine (SVM), 26 Wavelet Analysis (WA), 27 and Fuzzy Logic (FL). 28 The ANN is deemed one of the most popular statistical methods adopted to predict the PV generation with a prediction horizon of 24-h ahead.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohana et al (2021) employed machine learning (ML)-based algorithms to predict the generated power of a PV system for residential buildings [44]. Ajayi and Heymann (2021) modelled a novel Marine Predators Algorithm for both training an Artificial Neural Network model used for predicting the energy demand and PV output power [45]. developed two neural networks with different training ranges to replace the whole neural network for predicting I-V curves, P-V curves, and maximum power [46].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Occurrences of global minima and stagnation issues [3][4][5][6][7] • Scalability problems on the normalization procedures adopted [2,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17] • Over-fitting and under-fitting issues [5, 6, 9-11, 23, 48, 51] • Dimensionality constraints of the solar farm data and data handling issues [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] • Elapsed training time [29,31,37] • Data extraction problems in regression based ML models [10][11][12][13][14][15] • Higher number of trainable parameters in DL models [1, 14, 19-20, 26, 27, 43, 47] • Repetitive training of deep neural networks [19,20,26,27] • High computational overhead due to repetitive process [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] • Few predictor models with high complexity and data redundancy [45][46][47]…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%