2012
DOI: 10.15695/amqst.v9i1-2.3641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

David Spener, 'Clandestine Crossings: Migrants and Coyotes on the Texas-Mexico Border'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is necessary to consider the existence of false coyotes , people who do not intend to take migrants to the agreed destination, but to cheat, rob, assault them, etc. (Spener, 2009).…”
Section: Analytical Framework Of the Victimization Of Mexicans Migran...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is necessary to consider the existence of false coyotes , people who do not intend to take migrants to the agreed destination, but to cheat, rob, assault them, etc. (Spener, 2009).…”
Section: Analytical Framework Of the Victimization Of Mexicans Migran...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to immigration authorities and international organizations, coyotes frequently victimize their "clients" and abandon them to their fate in places where their lives are in danger (Díaz Ferraro et al 2020). For their part, migrants expect coyotes to facilitate the clandestine crossing of territories and borders, as well as to minimize risks along the way, including crime (Bhabha and Zard 2006;Spener 2009;Palacios 2017b;Cortés 2018). The specialized academic literature on coyotaje warns about the risks of hire with coyotes: abandonment, deception, sexual assault, robbery, and assault (Zazueta 1983;Slack and Whiteford 2011;Freedman 2016b;Izcara Palacios 2017a, 2017bUNODC 2020); but it also highlights that the source of income of the coyotes depends on a reputation they must build by complying with the agreements they establish with migrants and effectively safeguarding migrant "clients."…”
Section: Explaining the Differences In Victimization Of The Different...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between migration agents and the state has been a matter of debate among scholars. Some argue that the migration business entrepreneurs erase the international borders by circumventing the legal barriers (Harney, 1977;Spaan, 1994), while others conceive of the state as having ultimate control over the border (Spener, 2009a(Spener, , 2009b. By defining the intermediaries as entrepreneurs in 'Migration Industry', Hernandez-Leon (2008) argues for a fundamental role of both sending-and receiving-states that shape 'the contours of the migration industry, the rise and fall of particular types of entrepreneurs and activities, and the social organisation of services offered to sojourners and the employers of immigrants labor' (p. 156).…”
Section: The Relationship Between the Agents And The Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peck (1996) observes how agents manipulated the legal restrictions to bring Italian migrants to the USA between 1885 and 1925. More recently, Singer and Massey (1998) and Spener (2009aSpener ( , 2009b identify increasing operations of the coyotes 1 with extended border control initiatives along the USA-Mexico border. Other scholars recognise legal obstructions to enter the destination countries as creating opportunities for agents to develop migration business (Collyer, 2005;Griffin, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%