2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEA for nonhomogeneous mixed networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional DEA models assume that all DMUs shared homogeneous technology, however, this assumption ignores heterogeneous technology derived from different external environments, such as systematic, cultural, regulatory and endowment differences. Recently, non-homogeneous networks have been considered in DEA by some scholars [23,24]. In line with previous studies, we incorporated technological heterogeneity into the DEA model rather than time heterogeneity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Traditional DEA models assume that all DMUs shared homogeneous technology, however, this assumption ignores heterogeneous technology derived from different external environments, such as systematic, cultural, regulatory and endowment differences. Recently, non-homogeneous networks have been considered in DEA by some scholars [23,24]. In line with previous studies, we incorporated technological heterogeneity into the DEA model rather than time heterogeneity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Efficiency analysis in this kind of models is of high importance. Du et al (2015) and Barat et al (2018) focused on heterogeneity in network DEA models. The paper Singh and Ranjan (2017) is focused on efficiency analysis of non-homogeneous parallel systems for the performance measurement in higher education which is an important topic not only in our conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, multi-objective optimization requires the definition of weights, which in the context of product design, biases towards local optima metrics (Tavana et al (2016)). To avoid biased weights on evaluation metrics, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) (Charnes et al (1978)) is a well-known nonparametric approach which computes weights based on the fact that each evaluation item gets the highest evaluation in relative terms; thus, it is possible to construct a one-dimensional indicator avoiding biases to local optima judgements (Barat et al (2018); Forsund (2018)), which has positive implications for marketing and product development. There exists several studies focusing on DEA, for instance, the work by (Doyle (2014)) and (Seiford and Zhu (2003)) on printers, and the work by (Papagapiou et al (1997)) on vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%