2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deadwood and tree microhabitat dynamics in unharvested temperate mountain mixed forests: A life-cycle approach to biodiversity monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This roughly corresponds to one third of the time necessary for a forest stand to complement a full sylvigenetic cycle (Larrieu et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This roughly corresponds to one third of the time necessary for a forest stand to complement a full sylvigenetic cycle (Larrieu et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, Larrieu et al . () showed that the availability of TreMs appears to be rather stable in unmanaged mountain mixed forests of different development stages, in terms of both quantity and diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The explicit inclusion of natural eco-units or FDPs in forest management planning could favor the incorporation of the often missing culmination and disintegration phases, fundamental to guarantee high levels of microhabitats and deadwood (Larrieu et al 2014b). Furthermore, natural early-seral stages can present old-growth forest structural attributes, thus where forest management focuses on ecological complexity this phase should be valued as well (Donato et al 2012).…”
Section: Translating Old-growth Forest Features Into Management Princmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural data (e.g., vertical and horizontal structure of the tree canopy, amount, size-and decay stage distribution of deadwood, type and amount of microhabitats) have been collected by different specific monitoring programs, like studies on forest naturalness (Bartha et al 2006, Grabherr et al 1998, Winter 2012, forest reserve programs (Parvianen et al 2000) or specific conservation research focusing on habitat needs (e.g., deadwood, microhabitats) of certain forest specialist (Ódor and van Hees 2004, Ódor et al 2006, Müller and Bütler 2010, Larrieu et al 2014, Gouix et al 2015. Similar data are collected within the framework of national monitoring programs of Natura 2000 habitats (e.g., Louette et al 2015).…”
Section: In the Vast Majority Of Forest Regions And Forest Types Commentioning
confidence: 99%