2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debris impact under extreme hydrodynamic conditions part 2: Impact force responses for non-rigid debris collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often in experiments a breaking bore is assumed either generated through dam breaks (see e.g. Yeh, 1991;Derschum et al, 2018;Stolle et al, 2018) or as a result of breaking elongated solitary waves (see e.g. Goseberg et al, 2016;Nistor et al, 2017), but a tsunami can run-up in other ways as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often in experiments a breaking bore is assumed either generated through dam breaks (see e.g. Yeh, 1991;Derschum et al, 2018;Stolle et al, 2018) or as a result of breaking elongated solitary waves (see e.g. Goseberg et al, 2016;Nistor et al, 2017), but a tsunami can run-up in other ways as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments were performed within the context of a larger experimental protocol examining debris impact forces on a structure (Derschum et al 2018, Stolle et al 2018a, 2018c, 2019. The structure (0.20 m × 0.20 m × 0.80 m) was placed at a distance of 7.03 m from the gate.…”
Section: Methodology 21 Experimental Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For debris force, the equation of Haechnel and Daly (2004) adapted by Stolle et al (2018) with a correction factor equal to 0.52 was used (Equation ( 5)). This considers flow velocity v flow ( m s Þ, debris average diameter D deb m ð Þ, and specific weight of gravel blocks c deb kN m 3 equal to 25.97 (Wang et al 2018).…”
Section: Embankment Sliding Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%