2014
DOI: 10.1109/tsc.2013.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Enactment of BPEL Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Orchestration defines explicit workflow control flow structures to coordinate the invocation of service operations exogenously and, like dataflows, it can be centralised or distributed. A centralised orchestration [72,136,137,138] has full control over all the services composed, whereas a distributed approach (also known as "decentralised orchestration" [139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148]) defines sub-workflows for a collaborative exchange of workflow control flow over the network. Although orchestration is not as popular as dataflows, there are some implementations available for this mechanism to support the definition of control-driven IoT workflows [149,150,151].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Orchestration defines explicit workflow control flow structures to coordinate the invocation of service operations exogenously and, like dataflows, it can be centralised or distributed. A centralised orchestration [72,136,137,138] has full control over all the services composed, whereas a distributed approach (also known as "decentralised orchestration" [139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148]) defines sub-workflows for a collaborative exchange of workflow control flow over the network. Although orchestration is not as popular as dataflows, there are some implementations available for this mechanism to support the definition of control-driven IoT workflows [149,150,151].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This negatively impacts QoS by increasing the response time, and leads to network congestion [34,141,142,190,195], especially when there are plenty of IoT services exchanging huge amounts of data continuously [24,25,187,190,196]. To avoid a single bottleneck, the distributed approach [133,139,140,141,142,143,144,146] removes the central composite and distributes the load of data over multiple composites (see Figure 10(b)). Although this improves load balancing, it introduces unnecessary network overhead as data passes through many mediators, even if data is unimportant for them, i.e., the more mediators, the more network overhead.…”
Section: Decentralised Data Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another progress is to explore browser-kernel-level extensions to enable data exchange and communication between MUIT Web applications with other native apps. Supporting orchestration of these distributed mobile users and their screens [27] and avoiding potential crossorganization security [36] are also worth investigating to meet the BYOD requirements for enterprise.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to it, service components that are derived by our methods have no responsibilities for partitioning the process and delivering process information. Another example is the work that presented a distributed architecture based on the hypercube P2P topology along with a set of algorithms that enable the decentralized execution of BPEL processes . Their approaches depend on a special topology of system, whereas our methods are not subject to any dedicated topology of system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%