“…Biodegradable polymers with tunable degradation rates could be both natural (from human or animal tissues) and synthetic. Their degradation rate depends on molecular weight, the structural arrangement of macromolecules (amorphous/crystal structure), isomeric characteristics, formulation, architecture, and quantity of the material [[109], [110], [111], [112], [113], [114], [115], [116], [117], [118], [119], [120], [121], [122], [123], [124], [125], [126], [127], [128], [129], [130], [131], [132], [133], [134], [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140], [141], [142], [143], [144], [145], [146], [147], [148], [149], [150], [151]]. Natural polymer scaffolds usually demonstrate a lack of immune response and better cell interactions while synthetic polymers are cheaper, stronger, and have better functionality although sometimes triggering immune response and toxicity [37].…”