2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.584005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Brain Stimulation Impedance Decreases Over Time Even When Stimulation Settings Are Held Constant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from the SANTÉ epilepsy cohort are consistent with retrospective studies evaluating DBS in basal ganglia targets for movement disorders (Parkinson disease, essential tremor, dystonia), which report downward trends in impedance over many years of long-term follow up, with similar rates of change (range = 27-73 Ω/year). [29][30][31][32][33] In contrast, long-term measurement of impedance in the RNS pivotal trial demonstrated no significant changes in impedances, for both depth and subdural electrodes, from 1 year onward, 34 suggesting cortical (focal) and thalamic targets for stimulation may have unique electrode-tissue interface properties. Changes in impedance affect the volume of tissue activated (VTA) with DBS, and if large enough, may potentially impact clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Results from the SANTÉ epilepsy cohort are consistent with retrospective studies evaluating DBS in basal ganglia targets for movement disorders (Parkinson disease, essential tremor, dystonia), which report downward trends in impedance over many years of long-term follow up, with similar rates of change (range = 27-73 Ω/year). [29][30][31][32][33] In contrast, long-term measurement of impedance in the RNS pivotal trial demonstrated no significant changes in impedances, for both depth and subdural electrodes, from 1 year onward, 34 suggesting cortical (focal) and thalamic targets for stimulation may have unique electrode-tissue interface properties. Changes in impedance affect the volume of tissue activated (VTA) with DBS, and if large enough, may potentially impact clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Impedance values tend to decrease during chronic DBS in movement disorders, in a manner correlating with stimulation intensity. 16,17,20,21 Impedance also is thought to reflect the foreign-body reaction and capsule formation around the chronically implanted electrodes. 22 The accumulation of perielectrode fluid has been hypothesized to explain this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative pharmacological approaches that target cholinergic or adenosine receptor systems do not relieve symptoms to the same degree. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective for many patients, but this method is not appropriate for all patients, and there are issues with the long-term effectiveness of the implanted electrodes due to impedance changes (Nassery et al, 2016; Okun, 2012; Satzer et al, 2020; Voon et al, 2013). Other commonly reported side effects include impairment of axial motor performance and cognition, along with mood effects including apathy, anxiety, impulsiveness, and depressive symptoms (Hartmann et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%