Anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is becoming a more common treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy and depression display a bidirectional association. Anterior nucleus of thalamus has connections to anterior cingulate cortex and orbitomedial prefrontal cortex, hence, a possible role in emotional and executive functions, and thus, ANT DBS might exert psychiatric adverse effects. Our aim was to evaluate previous and current psychiatric symptoms in patients with epilepsy undergoing ANT DBS surgery and assess the predictability of psychiatric adverse effects. Programming-related psychiatric adverse effects are also reported. Method: Twenty-two patients with ANT DBS for retractable epilepsy were examined, and a psychiatric evaluation of depressive and other psychiatric symptoms was performed with Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Symptom Checklist prior to surgery, concentrating on former and current psychiatric symptoms and medications. The follow-up visit was one year after surgery. Results: At the group level, no changes on mood were observed during ANT DBS treatment. Two patients with former histories of depression experienced sudden depressive symptoms related to DBS programming settings; these were quickly alleviated after changing the stimulation parameters. In addition, two patients with no previous histories of psychosis gradually developed clear paranoid and anxiety symptoms that also relieved slowly after changing the programming settings. Conclusion:The majority of our ANT DBS patients did not experience psychiatric adverse effects. Certain DBS parameters might predispose to sudden depressive or slowly manifesting paranoid symptoms that are reversible via programming changes.
Objective Deep brain stimulation of the ANT is a novel treatment option in refractory epilepsy with an established efficacy at the group level. However, data on the effect of individualized programming are currently lacking. We report the effect of programming changes on outcome in deep brain stimulation of anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT DBS). Secondly, we investigated whether the effect differs between seizure types. Thirdly, we compared the response status between patients with stimulation contacts verified inside the ANT with patients with contacts located outside of ANT. Methods The participants were 27 consecutive patients with ANT DBS implantation with at least two‐year follow‐up. Seizures were subdivided into focal aware (FAS), focal impaired awareness (FIAS), and focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS). The patients’ seizure diaries were analyzed retrospectively to assess changes in different seizure types. Active contact locations for each patient were verified from preoperative MRI and postoperative CT fusion images using SureTune III (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) software. Results A significant reduction in monthly mean seizure frequency occurred in FIAS: 56% at two‐year and 65% at five‐year follow‐up. The effects on FAS and FBTCS were less pronounced. Patients with contacts inside the ANT or on the anterolateral border of ANT experienced a greater reduction in seizure frequency than patients with outside‐ANT contacts. Ultimately, seven patients became responders due to changes in DBS programming or repositioning of contacts, increasing our responder rate from 44% to 70% as measured by a seizure reduction of at least 50%. Significance ANT DBS appears to be especially effective in reducing FIAS, when the appropriately chosen contacts are activated.
BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT) is an emerging treatment option for patients suffering from refractory epilepsy. ANT has extensive connections with hippocampus and retrosplenial cingulum, areas associated mainly with spatial memory and with anterior cingulum which is important in executive functions. As refractory epilepsy is often associated with cognitive decline and neuronal damage, the decreased connectivity between ANT and remote structures might impact on the effects of DBS.ObjectiveWe hypothesized that the neuropsychological profile could reflect the connectivity of ANT and further predict the efficacy of ANT DBS. We evaluated the cognitive performance of patients with refractory epilepsy with DBS to evaluate whether neuropsychological profiles could reflect the connectivity of ANT and further predict the efficacy of ANT DBS.MethodSixteen patients with refractory epilepsy treated with ANT DBS with at least 2 years of follow-up were included in the study. Patients underwent a neuropsychological evaluation as a part of the protocol and their clinical outcome was determined by seizure frequency in the last 6 months compared to baseline. The patients were classified as responders if there was a ≥50% reduction in the frequency of the predominant seizure type, otherwise as nonresponders.ResultsThere were 12 responders and 4 nonresponders for ANT DBS treatment in the study population. Nonresponders performed worse than responders in neuropsychological tasks measuring executive functions and attention, such as the Trail-Making Test.ConclusionBetter executive functions and attention seemed to predict improved clinical outcome after the ANT DBS surgery. Based on our preliminary descriptive findings and the anatomical connectivity hypothesis, we suggest that deficits in executive functions may relate to an inferior outcome. This finding might offer new tools for refining the selection of patients with refractory epilepsy scheduled to undergo ANT DBS surgery. Moreover, it highlights the need for further investigations of neural connectivity in epilepsy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.