2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible psychiatric adverse effects related to deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus in patients with refractory epilepsy

Abstract: Anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is becoming a more common treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy and depression display a bidirectional association. Anterior nucleus of thalamus has connections to anterior cingulate cortex and orbitomedial prefrontal cortex, hence, a possible role in emotional and executive functions, and thus, ANT DBS might exert psychiatric adverse effects. Our aim was to evaluate previous and current psychiatric symptoms in patients with epilepsy und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) was approved in the United States for treatment of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy, and RNS targeting thalamic nuclei with diffuse cortical projections has also demonstrated promise for treating large epileptogenic networks . However, these approaches can be complicated by lead misplacement and by side effects intrinsic to stimulating brainstem nuclei, including sleep disruption, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and memory loss . Theoretically, direct cortical stimulation could avoid some of these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) was approved in the United States for treatment of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy, and RNS targeting thalamic nuclei with diffuse cortical projections has also demonstrated promise for treating large epileptogenic networks . However, these approaches can be complicated by lead misplacement and by side effects intrinsic to stimulating brainstem nuclei, including sleep disruption, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and memory loss . Theoretically, direct cortical stimulation could avoid some of these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the long‐term phase of the SANTE study, changing stimulation voltage from 5.0 to 7.5 V or frequency from 145 to 185 Hz did not show an effect on the seizure frequency more than initial settings 1 . We described previously patients that developed psychiatric adverse effects associated with ANT DBS programming settings 22 . As new‐onset psychiatric symptoms are a common finding following epilepsy surgical procedures, these symptoms related to ANT DBS can be alleviated by changing the stimulation intensity and different active contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For the one patient with initially one unilateral contact active in ANT (Patient 5) who refused suggested reimplantation, the active contacts were changed to the most superior ones by reprogramming and this allowed the volume of activated tissue around the other contact (that itself remained inferior to ANT) to reach ANT. This patient was a responder from the beginning, but the programming changes alleviated the patients’ psychiatric adverse effects 22 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in all previously published reports, the PSEs were time-related to stimulation. Järvenpää et al [9] suggested decreasing the voltage or changing the stimulation contacts to suppress PSEs. At the moment, there is no official recommendation for the management of PSEs in patients with ANT-DBS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%