2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2018.2825679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields With Asymmetric Inter-Object Constraints for Online Multi-Object Tracking

Abstract: Online Multi-Object Tracking (MOT) is a challenging problem and has many important applications including intelligence surveillance, robot navigation and autonomous driving. In existing MOT methods, individual object's movements and inter-object relations are mostly modeled separately and relations between them are still manually tuned. In addition, inter-object relations are mostly modeled in a symmetric way, which we argue is not an optimal setting. To tackle those difficulties, in this paper, we propose a D… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a fair comparison with the state-of-the-art MOT methods, we use the reference object detections provided by the benchmark . We train the set to set recognition method (Liu, Yan, and Ouyang 2017) based on the pre-trained GoogLeNet (Szegedy et al 2015) on the training set of MOT2016 to ex- In Table 3, NT is compared with the state-of-the-art methods including EAMTT (Sanchez-Matilla, Poiesi, and Cavallaro 2016), Quad (Son et al 2017), MHT (Kim et al 2015), STAM (Chu et al 2017), NOMT (Choi 2015), AMIR (Sadeghian, Alahi, and Savarese 2017), NLPa (Levinkov et al 2017), FWT (Henschel et al 2017), LMP , INT (Lan et al 2018), and DCCRF (Zhou et al 2018). Our NT method performs on par with the state-ofthe-art trackers (e.g., FWT and LMP) in terms of tracking accuracy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a fair comparison with the state-of-the-art MOT methods, we use the reference object detections provided by the benchmark . We train the set to set recognition method (Liu, Yan, and Ouyang 2017) based on the pre-trained GoogLeNet (Szegedy et al 2015) on the training set of MOT2016 to ex- In Table 3, NT is compared with the state-of-the-art methods including EAMTT (Sanchez-Matilla, Poiesi, and Cavallaro 2016), Quad (Son et al 2017), MHT (Kim et al 2015), STAM (Chu et al 2017), NOMT (Choi 2015), AMIR (Sadeghian, Alahi, and Savarese 2017), NLPa (Levinkov et al 2017), FWT (Henschel et al 2017), LMP , INT (Lan et al 2018), and DCCRF (Zhou et al 2018). Our NT method performs on par with the state-ofthe-art trackers (e.g., FWT and LMP) in terms of tracking accuracy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [117], Zhou et al proposed a visual displacement CNN, which learned to predict the next position of an object depending on previous positions of the objects, and the influence that an object had over other objects in the scene. That CNN was then used to predict the location of objects in the next frame, taking as input their past trajectories.…”
Section: Siamese Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-Object Tracking Framework. Recent research of MOT primarily follows the tracking-by-detection paradigm [6,11,38,50], where object of interests is first obtained by an object detector and then linked into trajectories via data association. The data association problem could be tackled from various perspectives, e.g., min-cost flow [11,20,37], Markov decision processes (MDP) [48], partial filtering [6], Hungarian assignment [38] and graph cut [44,49].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%