2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Multi-Modality Multi-Object Tracking

Abstract: Multi-sensor perception is crucial to ensure the reliability and accuracy in autonomous driving system, while multiobject tracking (MOT) improves that by tracing sequential movement of dynamic objects. Most current approaches for multi-sensor multi-object tracking are either lack of reliability by tightly relying on a single input source (e.g., center camera), or not accurate enough by fusing the results from multiple sensors in post processing without fully exploiting the inherent information. In this study, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
131
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness of our online multi-object tracking method, we compared our algorithm to several state-of-the-art approaches using both the KITTI and ATTD, including offline tracking methods like Siamese CNN [47], Convolutional Neural Networks and Temporally Constrained Metrics (CNNTCM) [48], Discrete-Continuous Energy Minimization (DCO-X) [49], and Learning Optimal Structured Support Vector Machine LP-SSVM [50], Online tracking methods like Near-Online Multi-Target Tracking (NOMT-HM) [51], Structural Constraint Event Aggregation (SCEA) [52], Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism (STAM) [3], Successive Shortest Path (SSP) [53], multi-modality Multi-Object Tracking (mmMOT) [54], and Multi-Object Tracking Beyond Pixels (MOTBeyondPixels) [55]. Some of these approaches could only be performed in the offline setting.…”
Section: Benchmark Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness of our online multi-object tracking method, we compared our algorithm to several state-of-the-art approaches using both the KITTI and ATTD, including offline tracking methods like Siamese CNN [47], Convolutional Neural Networks and Temporally Constrained Metrics (CNNTCM) [48], Discrete-Continuous Energy Minimization (DCO-X) [49], and Learning Optimal Structured Support Vector Machine LP-SSVM [50], Online tracking methods like Near-Online Multi-Target Tracking (NOMT-HM) [51], Structural Constraint Event Aggregation (SCEA) [52], Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism (STAM) [3], Successive Shortest Path (SSP) [53], multi-modality Multi-Object Tracking (mmMOT) [54], and Multi-Object Tracking Beyond Pixels (MOTBeyondPixels) [55]. Some of these approaches could only be performed in the offline setting.…”
Section: Benchmark Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning is driven by reconstruction error based on backpropagation. Zhang et al [27] tracked objects in multi-modal scenarios by adopting a deep architecture that can be trained in an end-to-end manner, thereby enabling the joint optimization of the base feature extractors of each modality and an adjacency estimator for cross-modality. Wen et al [28] proposed an MOT algorithm based on a non-uniform hypergraph that can model different degrees of dependency among tracklets for a unified objective.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multimodal machine learning aims to build models that can process, correlate, and integrate information from multiple modalities [2]. The success of multimodal machine learning has been demonstrated in a wide range of applications, e,g, human action analysis [1,4,37,38] , person/object localization and tracking [15,34,47] and image segmentation [14,51].…”
Section: Multimodal Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%