2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning algorithm in detecting intracranial hemorrhages on emergency computed tomographies

Abstract: Background Highly accurate detection of intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) on head computed tomography (HCT) scans can prove challenging at high-volume centers. This study aimed to determine the number of additional ICHs detected by an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm and to evaluate reasons for erroneous results at a level I trauma center with teleradiology services. Methods In a retrospective multi-center cohort study, consecutive emergency non-contrast HCT scans were analyzed by a commercially available… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other findings with high HU, such as basal ganglia calcification, beam hardening artifacts, dense cortical veins, and dural venous sinuses, were misclassified as hemorrhage. This is concordant with prior results in that common AI overcalls are calcification and beam-hardening artifacts 25 , 26 . While radiologists and clinicians gain experience in identifying actual ICHs, AI analysis software must also be trained to recognize these ICH mimickers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other findings with high HU, such as basal ganglia calcification, beam hardening artifacts, dense cortical veins, and dural venous sinuses, were misclassified as hemorrhage. This is concordant with prior results in that common AI overcalls are calcification and beam-hardening artifacts 25 , 26 . While radiologists and clinicians gain experience in identifying actual ICHs, AI analysis software must also be trained to recognize these ICH mimickers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In general, it appears reasonable that the relatively high false-positive rate may be explained by disturbing hyperdensities like artifacts, tumors, and defects, especially near the skull base [22]. For example, Kundisch et al described a relevant detection rate for these findings in an algorithm from a different vendor [23]. Our first two subgroup analyses suggest that neither motion and beam hardening artifacts nor chronic brain defects are a reason for the low PPV, since the adjusted rate of false-positive findings was just a tiny bit lower (PPV: 63.0% compared to 56.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, IT and software development may continue to play a supporting role in further technological development at TMC and the challenge of dealing with an increasing image load. AI can further enhance QA through the reduction of false negative findings [ 40 ] and support in handling growing image volumes through an efficiency increase in the reporting process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%