2012
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201127442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect levels in SnS thin films prepared using chemical spray pyrolysis

Abstract: The origin of various defect levels in the SnS thin films deposited using chemical spray pyrolysis (CSP) technique has been explored in this manuscript, by employing low‐temperature photoluminescence (PL) technique. Concentration of Sn in the samples was varied purposefully by ex situ diffusion in order to alter the defect levels. The acceptor level obtained at 0.22 eV from the Arrhenius plot, has been assigned as the defect level caused by the Sn vacancies present in the lattice. Two shallow donor levels are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the UPS spectra for the (100) surfaces of the Cl-doped and Br-doped SnS. The ionization potential (IP) derived from the energy difference between the secondary electron cutoff and valence band edge was 5.06 and 5.11 eV for the Cl-doped and Br-doped crystals, respectively; these values are almost identical to those of previously reported p-type SnS thin films determined via in situ UPS (5.1 eV) and Kelvin probe force microscopy (5.03 eV) . On the basis of the UPS and XPS results, band diagrams for the undoped, Cl-doped, and Br-doped SnS single crystals are revealed, as schematically shown in Figure .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure shows the UPS spectra for the (100) surfaces of the Cl-doped and Br-doped SnS. The ionization potential (IP) derived from the energy difference between the secondary electron cutoff and valence band edge was 5.06 and 5.11 eV for the Cl-doped and Br-doped crystals, respectively; these values are almost identical to those of previously reported p-type SnS thin films determined via in situ UPS (5.1 eV) and Kelvin probe force microscopy (5.03 eV) . On the basis of the UPS and XPS results, band diagrams for the undoped, Cl-doped, and Br-doped SnS single crystals are revealed, as schematically shown in Figure .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…On the basis of the UPS and XPS results, band diagrams for the undoped, Cl-doped, and Br-doped SnS single crystals are revealed, as schematically shown in Figure . The obtained work function (WF) of the Cl-doped and Br-doped SnS crystals (WF = 4.11 and 4.26 eV, respectively) was smaller than those of the p-type SnS thin films (WF = 4.6 and 4.92 eV, respectively). , Hence, the results show that the obtained Cl-doped and Br-doped SnS crystals are n-type with respect to their electronic structures as well as their electrical properties. We believe that the large n-type SnS crystals obtained in this work would lead to the fabrication of p-n homojunction SnS solar cells with a high conversion efficiency.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…range from 5.2 to 5.3 eV, 46,47 while that of SnS is about 4.9 eV; these values were all measured using KPFM. 48 Therefore, the other phase on the surface, which was mentioned in Figure 6d and Figure 6h, could be SnS 2 . The results of the micro-Raman scattering and HRTEM measurements can thus be used to determine the presence of SnS 2 on the surface.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…SnS 2 has a larger band gap than SnS, and the work function of SnS 2 (Φ SnS2 = 5.36 ± 0.45 eV) is higher than that of SnS (Φ SnS = 4.4–4.9 eV). Reported values of the work function of SnS 2 range from 5.2 to 5.3 eV, , while that of SnS is about 4.9 eV; these values were all measured using KPFM . Therefore, the other phase on the surface, which was mentioned in Figure d and Figure h, could be SnS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Figure again confirms the presence of 0.62 and 0.84 eV peaks, moreover, another strong 0.4 eV peak is also observed. We tentatively assign the 0.62 and 0.84 eV peaks to transitions involving deep levels in the bandgap of SnS . We hypothesize the absorption peak at 0.4 eV to be due to transfer of dopant electrons from sodium impurities to the lowest unoccupied quantum‐confined orbital (LUQCO) of SnS QD.…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 95%