2017
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2017.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining the functional traits that drive bacterial decomposer community productivity

Abstract: Microbial communities are essential to a wide range of ecologically and industrially important processes. To control or predict how these communities function, we require a better understanding of the factors which influence microbial community productivity. Here, we combine functional resource use assays with a biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) experiment to determine whether the functional traits of constituent species can be used to predict community productivity. We quantified the abilities of 12 ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cellobiose-metabolizing, noncellulolytic microbes can be thought of as 'cheaters'; they used the cellobiose public goods without producing or secreting cellulases, reducing cellobiose availability for the cellulolytic microbes. Previous studies have also found that cheaters use public goods during cellulose degradation and during the breakdown of other polysaccharides (21,(47)(48)(49), and cheaters have been shown to have both detrimental and positive effects on the rate of degradation (25,50,51). Our data suggest that in enrichment lines 1A and 1B, degradation was slowed by high levels of β-glucosidase genes from diverse microbes (Fig.…”
Section: Signatures Of Competition Dominate In Enriched Communities supporting
confidence: 71%
“…The cellobiose-metabolizing, noncellulolytic microbes can be thought of as 'cheaters'; they used the cellobiose public goods without producing or secreting cellulases, reducing cellobiose availability for the cellulolytic microbes. Previous studies have also found that cheaters use public goods during cellulose degradation and during the breakdown of other polysaccharides (21,(47)(48)(49), and cheaters have been shown to have both detrimental and positive effects on the rate of degradation (25,50,51). Our data suggest that in enrichment lines 1A and 1B, degradation was slowed by high levels of β-glucosidase genes from diverse microbes (Fig.…”
Section: Signatures Of Competition Dominate In Enriched Communities supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Biological richness (e.g. the number of functionally different genotypes within a community) is one factor that may be important (Bell et al, 2005;Duffy, 2009;Cardinale, 2011;Gravel et al, 2011;Peter et al, 2011;Bouvier et al, 2012;Cardinale et al, 2012;Dell'Anno et al, 2012;Hernandez-Raquet et al, 2013;Philippot et al, 2013;Johnson et al, 2015a;Evans et al, 2017;Stadler et al, 2017). Communities with higher biological richness are more likely to contain genotypes that have direct or indirect positive effects on the rate of a particular metabolic process (Loreau et al, 2001;Balvanera et al, 2006;Cardinale et al, 2006;Cardinale, 2011;Cardinale et al, 2012;Tilman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While positive associations between biological richness and the rates of particular metabolic processes have been observed (Bell et al, 2005;Cardinale, 2011;Gravel et al, 2011;Peter et al, 2011;Bouvier et al, 2012;Cardinale et al, 2012;Dell'Anno et al, 2012;Hernandez-Raquet et al, 2013;Philippot et al, 2013;Johnson et al, 2015a;Evans et al, 2017;Stadler et al, 2017), it remains unclear whether these positive associations are a general feature of the metabolic processes performed by microbial communities. For example, while many studies have observed positive associations between biological richness and the rates of some metabolic processes (Bell et al, 2005;Cardinale, 2011;Gravel et al, 2011;Peter et al, 2011;Bouvier et al, 2012;Cardinale et al, 2012;Dell'Anno et al, 2012;Hernandez-Raquet et al, 2013;Philippot et al, 2013;Johnson et al, 2015a;Evans et al, 2017;Stadler et al, 2017), other studies have not (Salonius, 1981;Griffiths et al, 2001;Wertz et al, 2006;Szabó et al, 2007;Peter et al, 2011;Pholchan et al, 2013;Graham et al, 2014;Roger et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeking to overcome these challenges, previous studies have sequenced and functionally characterized microbial communities from different biomass-degrading environments. Examples include microbial communities from compost [ 7 9 ], bovine rumen [ 6 , 10 ], guts of animals [ 11 16 ], soil [ 17 , 18 ], and river water [ 19 ]. These studies have revealed the lignocellulolytic capabilities of microbial communities present in diverse ecosystems and the highly complex and cooperative interactions between multiple microbial species and their enzymes to achieve lignocellulose breakdown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%