1996
DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.1996040101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definition and Measurement of End User Computing Sophisticiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our confidence in the measurement model was bolstered by the statistical significance of all factor loadings, and the fact that all but two of these loadings exceeded the 0.4 threshold commonly considered meaningful in structural model investigations (Ford et al , 1986). We used the “rho coefficient” (see, for example, Blili et al , 1994, for more details about the coefficient) to check the reliabilities of the model constructs primarily because it is not dependent on the number of items in the scale. The obtained rho coefficients for the attitudinal and the transaction‐specific constructs were 0.831 and 0.522 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our confidence in the measurement model was bolstered by the statistical significance of all factor loadings, and the fact that all but two of these loadings exceeded the 0.4 threshold commonly considered meaningful in structural model investigations (Ford et al , 1986). We used the “rho coefficient” (see, for example, Blili et al , 1994, for more details about the coefficient) to check the reliabilities of the model constructs primarily because it is not dependent on the number of items in the scale. The obtained rho coefficients for the attitudinal and the transaction‐specific constructs were 0.831 and 0.522 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-user computing is a steadily growing area of the IT industry (Kettelhut, 1992;Blili et al, 1996). The proliferation of personal computers within organizations has meant that an increasing number of end users are now capable of potentially developing their own applications (Moynihan, 1993;Edberg & Bowman, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of these studies do not compare all three data models in all the database tasks (modeling, query writing, query comprehension) nor do they study the relationship of user performance over different database tasks, thereby limiting our understanding of how end‐user computing performance can be enhanced. This gap in knowledge is increasingly problematic in the present situation as more of today's sophisticated knowledge workers are increasingly participating in the design, development, and implementation of their own application programs using commercially available database systems (Blili, Raymond, & Rivard, 1996; Kappelman, Thompson, & McLean, 1993; Powell & Moore, 2002). For the computer information systems department to provide effective end‐user training and consultancy services, it is thus critical to develop a holistic understanding of the effectiveness of the three data models for different database tasks, and on how a task can affect another task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%