2020
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2019-0406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density-dependent consequences of size-selective induced life-history changes to population fitness in medaka (Oryzias latipes)

Abstract: There is an increasing concern about the potential for size-selective harvest to impair population persistence. Yet little is known about the relative contribution of the evolutionary (shifts in life history) and demographic effects (decreased population density and size truncation) of harvesting to changes in fitness. Using medaka (Oryzias latipes), we experimentally investigated the fitness consequences of antagonistic size-dependent selection under contrasted levels of density (low vs. high) and size struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First is an increased larvae–juvenile survival in LB populations compared with SB populations (in high fish density), second is an increased somatic grow rate of LB offspring that accelerates the larvae–juvenile transition and ultimately increases juvenile abundance. Altogether, these density-dependent effects highlight that LB fish cope better with competition, which could translate into higher population growth rate and maybe also a higher carrying capacity [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First is an increased larvae–juvenile survival in LB populations compared with SB populations (in high fish density), second is an increased somatic grow rate of LB offspring that accelerates the larvae–juvenile transition and ultimately increases juvenile abundance. Altogether, these density-dependent effects highlight that LB fish cope better with competition, which could translate into higher population growth rate and maybe also a higher carrying capacity [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, most fisheries management models assume that harvesting increases biomass production by populations [ 21 ]. However, harvest-induced evolution towards slower somatic growth might decrease the ability of exploited populations to cope with competition and to increase production in response to lower density and higher food availability [ 6 , 22 , 23 ]. To date, however, there is scant knowledge on the context-dependency of evolution-induced effects of harvesting (Environment × Evolution; but see [ 24 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations