2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00435-016-0312-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental sexual dimorphism and morphology of Urotrygon microphthalmum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher and sharper mature male teeth are indeed assumed to function in grasping females and consequently to facilitate clasper introduction during copulation (Springer, 1966; McEachran, 1977; McCourt and Kerstitch, 1980; Cappetta, 1986; Ellis and Shackley, 1995; Kajiura and Tricas, 1996; Pratt Jr. and Carrier, 2001; Litvinov and Laptikhovsky, 2005; Gutteridge and Bennett, 2014). This feature has been recorded as a seasonal variation in the Atlantic stingray Dasyatis sabina (Kajiura and Tricas, 1996), while it is assumed to be a fixed‐in‐time feature in other elasmobranch species for which it has been described (Gutteridge and Bennett, 2014; de Sousa Rangel et al ., 2016). Gynandric heterodonty has also been only described at sexually mature stages, suggesting that sex‐hormone signals triggering the reproductive activity may also be involved in the development of the observed dental sexual dimorphism (McEachran, 1977; Cappetta, 1986; Snelson et al ., 1997; Powter et al ., 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher and sharper mature male teeth are indeed assumed to function in grasping females and consequently to facilitate clasper introduction during copulation (Springer, 1966; McEachran, 1977; McCourt and Kerstitch, 1980; Cappetta, 1986; Ellis and Shackley, 1995; Kajiura and Tricas, 1996; Pratt Jr. and Carrier, 2001; Litvinov and Laptikhovsky, 2005; Gutteridge and Bennett, 2014). This feature has been recorded as a seasonal variation in the Atlantic stingray Dasyatis sabina (Kajiura and Tricas, 1996), while it is assumed to be a fixed‐in‐time feature in other elasmobranch species for which it has been described (Gutteridge and Bennett, 2014; de Sousa Rangel et al ., 2016). Gynandric heterodonty has also been only described at sexually mature stages, suggesting that sex‐hormone signals triggering the reproductive activity may also be involved in the development of the observed dental sexual dimorphism (McEachran, 1977; Cappetta, 1986; Snelson et al ., 1997; Powter et al ., 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater insertion of teeth in the upper jaw in females is also observed in other species, whereas functional consequences remain unknown (Rangel et al 2016). Studies show that mature males can present great differentiation in relation to dentition, since changes may occur during the reproductive period (Gutteridge and Bennett 2014;Belleggia et al 2016;Rangel et al 2016). Such changes make male dentition more triangular and elongated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding sexes, differences in dentition were also observed, with females presenting more differentiated and heterogeneous teeth. Greater insertion of teeth in the upper jaw in females is also observed in other species, whereas functional consequences remain unknown (Rangel et al 2016). Studies show that mature males can present great differentiation in relation to dentition, since changes may occur during the reproductive period (Gutteridge and Bennett 2014;Belleggia et al 2016;Rangel et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A mating season modification of teeth from flat (for crushing food) to needle-like teeth in males is known from several ray species, for example Dasyatis americana, Urolophus halleri and Urotrygon microphthalmum. This morphological modification of teeth is linked to mating behavior in these species (Chapman et al 2003;Nordell 1994;Rangel et al 2016). If similar reasons increase the number of upper tooth cusplets in males of E. spinax remain speculative.…”
Section: Intraspecific Dental Variationmentioning
confidence: 98%