2007
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927607073631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth Sectioning of Individual Dopant Atoms with Aberration-Corrected Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the shape of the electron probe is not strongly altered by interactions with the sample, an ADF-STEM image can be simulated by using the intensity profile of the unperturbed incident beam as the PSF and convolving it with the specimen. This model is often referred to as an incoherent linear imaging model Black & Linfoot, 1957;Loane et al, 1988;Hillyard & Silcox, 1993;Kirkland, 1998;Xin et al, 2008c;Xin & Muller, 2009!. In a traditional aberration-uncorrected ADF-STEM, the depth of focus is generally much larger than the thickness of 3D Imaging in Aberration-Corrected Electron Microscopes 447 the sample~Fig.…”
Section: D Incoherent Linear Imaging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If the shape of the electron probe is not strongly altered by interactions with the sample, an ADF-STEM image can be simulated by using the intensity profile of the unperturbed incident beam as the PSF and convolving it with the specimen. This model is often referred to as an incoherent linear imaging model Black & Linfoot, 1957;Loane et al, 1988;Hillyard & Silcox, 1993;Kirkland, 1998;Xin et al, 2008c;Xin & Muller, 2009!. In a traditional aberration-uncorrected ADF-STEM, the depth of focus is generally much larger than the thickness of 3D Imaging in Aberration-Corrected Electron Microscopes 447 the sample~Fig.…”
Section: D Incoherent Linear Imaging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference is dramatic as channeling conditions can alter the probe shape so strongly as to sometimes create a nodal point where one would expect it to reach its maximum, or vice versa. As channeling can transform a maximum in the probe profile into a minimum or multiple maxima at incorrect locations~Voyles et al, 2003;Nellist et al, 2008b;Xin et al, 2008bXin et al, , 2008cLupini et al, 2009!, unexpected artifacts can be created when depth sectioning crystalline materials. This is demonstrated in Figure 5b, where the depth-sectioning profile of a single hafnium atom in crystalline silicon~c-Si!…”
Section: Depth Sectioning Of Individual Atoms and Extended Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, objects in focus are rendered sharper in the resulting image. The tradeoff between depth of field and lateral resolution can be problematic for biological samples with a large specimen thickness, especially for tomography (Hyun, et al, 2008); for determining the size distribution of catalysts nanoparticles on electrode supports; or high resolution electron microscopy where the depth of field becomes extremely small (Behan, et al, 2009;Xin, et al, 2008;Xin & Muller, 2009). The lateral resolution improves inversely proportional to the semi-angle of convergence, α max , while the depth of field has a more rapidly-diminishing inverse squared relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%