2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40462-015-0043-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving movement properties and the effect of the environment from the Brownian bridge movement model in monkeys and birds

Abstract: BackgroundThe Brownian bridge movement model (BBMM) provides a biologically sound approximation of the movement path of an animal based on discrete location data, and is a powerful method to quantify utilization distributions. Computing the utilization distribution based on the BBMM while calculating movement parameters directly from the location data, may result in inconsistent and misleading results. We show how the BBMM can be extended to also calculate derived movement parameters. Furthermore we demonstrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Buchin et al . ) provide tools for mapping movement attributes (such as velocity) in space, which can then be compared to environmental covariates. The approach presented here is less mechanistic, but provides a direct way for testing for effects of environmental covariates on movement patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Buchin et al . ) provide tools for mapping movement attributes (such as velocity) in space, which can then be compared to environmental covariates. The approach presented here is less mechanistic, but provides a direct way for testing for effects of environmental covariates on movement patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the here proposed framework as an additional tool complementing other existing techniques. For example, recent extensions to Brownian Bridges Movement Models (Horne et al 2007;Buchin et al 2015) provide tools for mapping movement attributes (such as velocity) in space, which can then be compared to environmental covariates. The approach presented here is less mechanistic, but provides a direct way for testing for effects of environmental covariates on movement patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected 20 locations from the standard error ellipse (based on the CRW output) around each location, creating 20 sets of locations for each track. Around each of these sets, we estimated the probability of occurrence across a regularized raster (1069 × 825 m resolution) using Brownian bridges, following a similar procedure as [21,27]. The resulting 20 distributions were then combined into one average UD by taking the mean value for each raster cell.…”
Section: Identification Of Areas Of High Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation is supported by experimental evaluation. We segmented trajectories from several data sets from movement ecology, collected from fishers [15,16], gulls [20] and vervet monkeys [6], with input sizes up to n = 111, 192 and m = 5, 000. The largest number of changes in the value of last in any single column of a table in these experiments is w = 12, so much smaller than m. In our experiments, w did not depend strongly on n and m: There were many trajectories of varying lengths in the data that had w close to 12 and w usually did not change when increasing m. The results of our experiments are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Table Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%