2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2012.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dermatitis de contacto alérgica por fragancias. Parte I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of fragrance contact allergy in patch tested patients in Spain is in the range of 8% to 10%, which is similar to that observed in most other countries, although a few studies in some European and Asian countries have found it to be much higher . These geographical variations could be partly attributable to the allergens used for testing, the different concentrations used, and the preferences of each culture for some fragrances over others . Our data support the hypothesis that fragrance allergies are accumulated over a lifetime (with people over the age of 40 years showing a higher prevalence), and provide convincing evidence to suggest that these allergies often aggravate irritant dermatitis (greater involvement of the hands among patients allergic to FM II), atopic dermatitis (greater frequency of allergy to HICC in patients with atopic dermatitis), or other dermatoses (greater frequency of allergy to MP in patients with stasis dermatitis).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalence of fragrance contact allergy in patch tested patients in Spain is in the range of 8% to 10%, which is similar to that observed in most other countries, although a few studies in some European and Asian countries have found it to be much higher . These geographical variations could be partly attributable to the allergens used for testing, the different concentrations used, and the preferences of each culture for some fragrances over others . Our data support the hypothesis that fragrance allergies are accumulated over a lifetime (with people over the age of 40 years showing a higher prevalence), and provide convincing evidence to suggest that these allergies often aggravate irritant dermatitis (greater involvement of the hands among patients allergic to FM II), atopic dermatitis (greater frequency of allergy to HICC in patients with atopic dermatitis), or other dermatoses (greater frequency of allergy to MP in patients with stasis dermatitis).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] Fragrance allergens are ubiquitous in our society, and the continuous and daily nature of exposure makes it difficult-if not impossible-for people with fragrance sensitivity to avoid them. 9,10 In recent years, both official institutions and the fragrance industry have become more aware of the problems caused by fragrance allergies, prompting important changes to legislation. Since 2005, European regulations have required the disclosure of 26 known fragrance contact allergens on labels for cosmetics 11 and household detergents, if present at a concentration of >0.001% (10 ppm) in a leave-on product or >0.01% (100 ppm) in a rinse-off product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Son alé rgenos ubicuos a los cuales nos exponemos de manera continua y diaria. Concretamente en Españ a el geraniol es la fragancia má s prevalente en los pacientes testados 9 . En un primer momento, por su frecuencia y por producir reacciones fotoalé rgicas, las fragancias junto con las tiazidas fueron los alé rgenos sospechosos del cuadro que presentaba la paciente.…”
Section: Fotodermatitis Connubial Connubial Photodermatitisunclassified
“…Evitar su contacto es una tarea difícil para los pacientes sensibilizados, que suelen presentar eczemas cró nicos de difícil manejo terapé utico y que provocan un importante deterioro de la calidad de vida del paciente. En 2003 la Unió n Europea designó 26 fragancias de declaració n obligatoria, entre las que se incluyen todas las presentes en la mezcla de fragancias I y II de la batería está ndar del GEIDAC como marcadores de sensibilizació n a fragancias 17 . Esta legislació n, aplicada en Españ a en 2005, supone un punto de inflexió n en el diagnó stico y tratamiento de la DCA a fragancias, ya que aquellos pacientes que presenten positividades para alguno de los marcadores de fragancias de la batería está ndar deberían ser testados con una serie específica de fragancias y, en funció n de los resultados, evitar ú nicamente las fragancias específicas a las que son alé rgicos, en lugar de recomendarles el uso de productos libres de fragancias.…”
unclassified