2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-67622014000100009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho do harvester na colheita de eucalipto em diferentes espaçamentos e declividades

Abstract: Os objetivos deste trabalho foram analisar e quantificar a influência das declividades (baixada - declividade média de 7,76° e encosta - declividade média de 17,17°) e dos espaçamentos de plantio (3 m x 2,5 m, 3 m x 3,33 m e 3 m x 4,0 m) sobre as capacidades produtivas do harvester em povoamentos de eucalipto de primeira rotação. As análises técnica e econômica estão fundamentadas no estudo de tempos e movimentos, nas produtividades e custos de produção do harvester. Os resultados mostraram que a atividade de … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
14
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This occurred by the fact that, in larger slopes; there are points of greater inclination that require the operator to change gears all the time to reduce speed and the risk of the harvester to fall over. Similar results were found by Leite et al (2014) in forestry mechanical harvesting, in which by working in areas of 17% of slope there an increase of 11% of the time is spent to perform the same amount of service to the area with 7% of slope, increasing the cost of harvesting. Höfig and Araujo-Junior (2014) emphasize the importance of considering the slope in the planning of the coffee mechanization, treating each slope level suitability in a unique way.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This occurred by the fact that, in larger slopes; there are points of greater inclination that require the operator to change gears all the time to reduce speed and the risk of the harvester to fall over. Similar results were found by Leite et al (2014) in forestry mechanical harvesting, in which by working in areas of 17% of slope there an increase of 11% of the time is spent to perform the same amount of service to the area with 7% of slope, increasing the cost of harvesting. Höfig and Araujo-Junior (2014) emphasize the importance of considering the slope in the planning of the coffee mechanization, treating each slope level suitability in a unique way.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, 60 measurements for each machine were performed, for analyzed factors, noise and vibration. Each measurement had duration of four minutes, a time interval capable of absorbing the entire operational cycle of the machine for the slaughter and processing of 10 trees [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Leite et al (2014), evaluated the harvester performance working in different spacing and declivity, they found different values for this work. The operation cost obtained by those authors was US$ 145.29 h -1 .…”
Section: Operational Costmentioning
confidence: 92%