2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and characterization of a tissue-equivalent CVD-diamond detector for clinical dosimetry in high-energy photon beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of Poly-C/Ni is nearly the same order as typical values suggested in the literature (50-135 nC/Gy.mm 3 ) [9,[20][21][22][23][24] for PTW natural diamond and for polycrystalline CVD diamond (~ 77 nC/Gy.mm 3 at a bias of 100 V) [10].…”
Section: Signal Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of Poly-C/Ni is nearly the same order as typical values suggested in the literature (50-135 nC/Gy.mm 3 ) [9,[20][21][22][23][24] for PTW natural diamond and for polycrystalline CVD diamond (~ 77 nC/Gy.mm 3 at a bias of 100 V) [10].…”
Section: Signal Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In the case of ∆ equals one, the integrated photocurrent of the device does not depend on the dose rate, which is an advantage in dosimetry applications. [9,[20][21][22][23][24] for both PTW natural diamond and synthetic CVD diamond devices. A similar result was reported by Buttar et al [22] for polycrystalline CVD diamond dosimeters with Cr/Au contact on both sides using 250 kV X-rays, where a slightly non-linear relationship with dose rate (∆ ≈ 0.91) was observed.…”
Section: Linearity and Dose Rate Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exponent values reported in the literature lie in the range 0.92-1 for PTW diamond detectors [24][25][26][27][28][29], 0.86-1.035 for CVD diamond [24,25,[30][31][32], and 0.49-0.97 for HPHT diamond [13,14]. The values observed for the devices fabricated on Diamond Materials and Element Six diamond films are close to one and hence compare well to the literature.…”
Section: Primed Responsesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A wide range of specific sensitivities have been reported for CVD diamond-based detectors, ranging from a few to over a thousand nC·Gy -1 ·mm -3 ; generally, the lower values (of up to ~100 nC·Gy -1 ·mm -3 ) appear to be reported for polycrystalline material grown in-house by the researchers [8,9,25,30,34], whereas the higher values were obtained using commercial CVD diamond, some of which was described as 'detector grade' [10,24,31,34,35]. Values between 18 and 164 nC·Gy -1 ·mm -3 have been reported for detectors based on HPHT diamonds [14].…”
Section: Primed Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous research groups have reported their results of x-ray detectors based on CVD diamond, a selection of these can be found in [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%