2012
DOI: 10.2528/pierb12011902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Optimization of Multilayered Electromagnetic Shield Using a Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: Abstract-We report optimized design of multilayered electromagnetic shield using real coded genetic algorithm. It is observed that the shielding effectiveness in multilayer design is higher than single layered counterpart of equal thickness. An effort has been made to develop an alternative approach to achieve specific objective of identifying the design characteristics of each layer in the multilayered shielding configuration. The proposed approach incorporates interrelated factors, such as absorption and ref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the electromagnetic wave propagation in multilayer systems, an exact numerical technique within the impedance method, which captures transmission (SE T ), reflection loss (RL) and attenuation, is employed by using of recurrent impedance ratios : RL=20Log10thinmathspace[ Absthinmathspace[ thinmathspace(XnZnormaln+1thinmathspace)/thinmathspace(Xn+Znormaln+1thinmathspace) thinmathspace] thinmathspace] SET=20Log10thinmathspace[ 140%∏j=1normalnAbsthinmathspace[ thinmathspace(Xj+Zjthinmathspace)/thinmathspace(Xj+Zj+1thinmathspace)enormalknormaljnormaldnormalj thinmathspace] thinmathspace] where Z i (X i ) – input (output) impedance for j th layer. Reflection loss RL is calculated for the n th layer and clearly depends on reflection losses on previous layers.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the electromagnetic wave propagation in multilayer systems, an exact numerical technique within the impedance method, which captures transmission (SE T ), reflection loss (RL) and attenuation, is employed by using of recurrent impedance ratios : RL=20Log10thinmathspace[ Absthinmathspace[ thinmathspace(XnZnormaln+1thinmathspace)/thinmathspace(Xn+Znormaln+1thinmathspace) thinmathspace] thinmathspace] SET=20Log10thinmathspace[ 140%∏j=1normalnAbsthinmathspace[ thinmathspace(Xj+Zjthinmathspace)/thinmathspace(Xj+Zj+1thinmathspace)enormalknormaljnormaldnormalj thinmathspace] thinmathspace] where Z i (X i ) – input (output) impedance for j th layer. Reflection loss RL is calculated for the n th layer and clearly depends on reflection losses on previous layers.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Equations (1) to (16), parameters often affect each other, varying simultaneously (for example D i , D o , and λ); therefore, the AFPM machine optimization is a non-linear problem. GA is a strong tool that can solve various complex and non-linear optimization problems [25,26]. GA may thus provide many answers for problem optimization due to its parallel search capability.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm and Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such schemes include non-linear optimization technique to achieve the predefined shielding effectiveness (SE) for a single-layer material within the given constraints of material parameters, [14] genetic algorithms (GAs) for synthesizing a planar multi-layer structure to be used as a filter, [15] GA for multi-layer structure of ICPbased composites, [16] winning particle optimization algorithm for designing multi-layer nanostructured composite, [17] and real-coded GA for designing multi-layered EM shield to achieve specific shielding requirements. [18,19] Although using these approaches, theoretically the shielding structure with desired properties can be obtained, however, the experimental realization and validation vastly differ from the predicted results because the underlying problem formulation involves deterministic optimization task. The optimal solution obtained under deterministic formulation might be the best choice, if no uncertainties in the design variables and parameters are expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[33] Step 6: Perform mutation operation using polynomial mutation operator to perturb the offspring in their neighborhood. Readers may refer [19] for SBX operator and mutation operator with example for the crossover and mutation of real variables, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%