2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.08.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design considerations and construction of a small animal PET prototype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To optimally use these pixels, newer generation scintillation crystals are segmented into into small pixel arrays. There are now a multitude of PET camera heads [1,2,3] The common feature of these instruments is that there is a very fine two-dimensional square pixellization, typically 2 to 4 mm a side, and an unpixellized third dimension. As the size of the pixels shrinks, the cost in generating these crystals grows, and the fraction of the area taken up by gaps between the crystals grows significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To optimally use these pixels, newer generation scintillation crystals are segmented into into small pixel arrays. There are now a multitude of PET camera heads [1,2,3] The common feature of these instruments is that there is a very fine two-dimensional square pixellization, typically 2 to 4 mm a side, and an unpixellized third dimension. As the size of the pixels shrinks, the cost in generating these crystals grows, and the fraction of the area taken up by gaps between the crystals grows significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%