Mobile Multimedia Communications 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0151-4_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Experience with an Integrated Testbed for Wireless Multimedia Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, the conventional CPU-centered shared-bus architecture requires frequent traversal of multimedia streams over the highly capacitive central bus and through the layers of OS software for the simplest operations such as multiplexing/demultiplexing and interstream synchronization. Indeed, measurements with a prototype wireless multimedia terminal at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) [14] with an embedded PC-based architecture show that large amounts of time and power go into memory and I/O transactions across the shared bus.…”
Section: I/o-centric Instead Of Cpu-centricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, the conventional CPU-centered shared-bus architecture requires frequent traversal of multimedia streams over the highly capacitive central bus and through the layers of OS software for the simplest operations such as multiplexing/demultiplexing and interstream synchronization. Indeed, measurements with a prototype wireless multimedia terminal at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) [14] with an embedded PC-based architecture show that large amounts of time and power go into memory and I/O transactions across the shared bus.…”
Section: I/o-centric Instead Of Cpu-centricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant number of packets are processed in a simple manner and forwarded to the next hop. For the sake of overall delay and power consumption these packets should be processed as near to the radio hardware as possible [1]. To show this we measured the percentage of received packets (both routing and data from all the nodes) that were accepted, dropped or forwarded for a specific scenario simulated on the NS-2 network simulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it has also been shown that significant improvements in throughput can result from letting the higher layers control radio parameters such as the processing gain [8], [9] when an increase in channel interference is indicated by throughput degradation. However, current commercial radios support limited dynamic adaptation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%