Proportional and derivative kick i.e., a large change in control action of a proportional plus integral plus derivative (PID) controller due to a sudden change in reference set-point is generally undesired in process industry. Therefore, the structure of conventional parallel PID controller is modified to integral minus proportional derivative (I−PD) controller. In this paper, three hybrid fuzzy IPD controllers such as a fuzzy I−fuzzy PD (FI−FPD) controller and its hybrid combinations with its conventional counterpart such as fuzzy I−PD (FI−PD) and I−fuzzy PD (I−FPD) are presented in view of above industrial problem. These controllers are based upon the counterpart conventional I−PD controller and contains analytical formulae. Computer simulations are carried out to evaluate the performance of hybrid fuzzy controllers along with conventional I−PD and PID controllers for set-point tracking and disturbance rejection for an induction motor in closed loop using LabVIEW TM environment. The gains of conventional and hybrid fuzzy controllers are tuned using genetic algorithm (GA) for minimum overshoot and settling time. It has been observed that hybrid fuzzy controllers along with the conventional I−PD controller significantly remove the kick from the control action in reference set-point tracking. However, in disturbance rejection, I−PD and FI−PD controllers fail to eliminate the kick from the control signal. In contrast, FI−FPD and I−FPD controllers considerably reduced spikes from the control action in disturbance rejection. Among the conventional and hybrid fuzzy IPD controllers, FI−FPD demonstrates much better set-point tracking and disturbance rejection response with spike free control action.Keywords: Proportional plus integral plus derivative (PID), integral minus proportional derivative (I−PD), hybrid fuzzy IPD controller, proportional kick, derivative kick.