2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-map.2019.0891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of compact patch antenna with enhanced gain and bandwidth for 5G mm‐wave applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antenna size is 140×100 mm 2 ; the frequency spans from 400 MHz to 20 GHz; and the gain is 6.3 dBi. A super compact parasitic patch antenna and a gain enhancement for super wideband applications are described in [25]. The antenna is 12×4.6×0.8 mm 3 in size with a bandwidth of 16 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antenna size is 140×100 mm 2 ; the frequency spans from 400 MHz to 20 GHz; and the gain is 6.3 dBi. A super compact parasitic patch antenna and a gain enhancement for super wideband applications are described in [25]. The antenna is 12×4.6×0.8 mm 3 in size with a bandwidth of 16 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A circular microstrip patch antenna with an elliptical slot working at 28 and 40 GHz is proposed in [7], and two electromagnetically coupled patches producing resonance at 38/60 GHz are discussed in [8]. A transparent rectangular-shaped patch with some branches using AgHT-8 material produces a wideband response from 23.92-43.8 GHz [9], a four-element tree-shaped MIMO antenna resonates 23 to 40 GHz [10], a parasitic patch-loaded radiator resonates between 24 to 40 GHz [11], incorporating slots at proper positions [12,13] produces dual-band resonance at 28/38 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To embed the benefits of SWB technology in practical wireless applications, multidimensional research has been undertaken for diverse antenna configurations. For the purpose of achieving wider bandwidth, many different kinds of bandwidth enhancement techniques, such as modification in the ground plane and the patch [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] along with a diverse range of feeding techniques, such as microstrip tapered feedline [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ] and Coplanar Waveguide (CPW) feed [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], have been proposed by antenna designers. To miniaturize the dimension of antenna without impacting the impedance bandwidth, self-similarity structures, such as fractal geometry [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], have been envisioned in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major problem associated with the aforementioned structures is, in spite of having wide impedance bandwidth, the designed antenna structures are not appropriate for low frequency band applications, such as Bluetooth, GPS and GSM. Ramanujam [ 5 ] proposed an SWB antenna with hybrid structure fed by an stepped microstrip line. Two semi-circular parasitic patches on the radiator enhances the impedance bandwidth from 24 to 40 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%