2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1684(01)00175-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of optimum high-order finite-wordlength digital FIR filters with linear phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As multiplication of sequences ( )and ( ) in time domain is equivalent to convolution of ( )and ( ) (in the frequency domain, it has the effect of smoothing ( ). The several effects of windowing the Fourier coefficients of the filter on the result of the frequency response of the filter are: a) major effect is that discontinuities in ( )becometransition bands between values on either side of the discontinuity, b) The width of the transition bands depends on the width of the main lobe of the frequency response of the window function, ( ) ( ), c) Since the filter frequency response is obtained via convolution relation, it is clear that the resulting filters are never optimal in any sense, d) As (the length of the window function) increases, themain lobe width of ( ) is reduced which reduces the widthof the transition band, but this also introduces more ripple in the frequency response, and e) The window function eliminates the ringing effects at band edge and does result in lower side lobes at the expense of an increase in the width of the transition band of the filter [5], [6]. The FIR filter design process via window functions can be split into several steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As multiplication of sequences ( )and ( ) in time domain is equivalent to convolution of ( )and ( ) (in the frequency domain, it has the effect of smoothing ( ). The several effects of windowing the Fourier coefficients of the filter on the result of the frequency response of the filter are: a) major effect is that discontinuities in ( )becometransition bands between values on either side of the discontinuity, b) The width of the transition bands depends on the width of the main lobe of the frequency response of the window function, ( ) ( ), c) Since the filter frequency response is obtained via convolution relation, it is clear that the resulting filters are never optimal in any sense, d) As (the length of the window function) increases, themain lobe width of ( ) is reduced which reduces the widthof the transition band, but this also introduces more ripple in the frequency response, and e) The window function eliminates the ringing effects at band edge and does result in lower side lobes at the expense of an increase in the width of the transition band of the filter [5], [6]. The FIR filter design process via window functions can be split into several steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let x i C n be the set containing all the elements of C n excluding x i . We quantize each coefficient of the optimal continuous coefficient vector X c one by one [6]- [7] according to the following procedure.…”
Section: A One-by-one Quantizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this requires a lengthy computation if the dimension of the problem is high. One way to solve the problem is to quantify the optimal continuous coefficient values one by one [6]- [7]. This way is adopted in [6] to solve discrete coefficient FIR filter design, and for the design of optimum high-order finite word length FIR filters in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method is a special case of a more general design method, which is thereafter introduced. This second, more general approach is similar to the IIR filter design method used in [10] and was successfully applied in [6], [7], [5] to the design of finite wordlength filters according to a constrained least squared error criterion [1], [23]. In this approach the coefficients are quantized successively: In each iteration step one coefficient is chosen (according to a certain selection criterion) and quantized.…”
Section: |E(ω)||mentioning
confidence: 99%