2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information &Amp; Communication Technology (RTEICT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/rteict.2016.7808008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Vedic IEEE 754 floating point multiplier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plan uses lesser giant kind of LUT's, consequently diminishes the electricity usage. Soumya Havaldar, adequate S Gurumurthy [4] proposed the structure of multiplier for drifting thing numbers using vedic generation. This shape likewise oversees flood, sub-modern-day-day and adjusting.…”
Section: Preceding Paintingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plan uses lesser giant kind of LUT's, consequently diminishes the electricity usage. Soumya Havaldar, adequate S Gurumurthy [4] proposed the structure of multiplier for drifting thing numbers using vedic generation. This shape likewise oversees flood, sub-modern-day-day and adjusting.…”
Section: Preceding Paintingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation was done using Vedic Mathematics using same approach outlined in [17]. The system of [27] computed the biased exponent by the summation of both biased exponents of inputs using binary adders followed by subtraction of the bias. The mantissa multiplication component of the single precision multiplier was implemented using a 24x24 Vedic Multiplier while the double precision mantissa multiplication was done using a 53x53 Vedic Multiplier as shown in Figure VI.…”
Section: Double Precision Floating-point Multiplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table VIII presents the area utilization for the double precision floating-point multiplier of [27] while Table IX presents the delay comparison for previous system from [17] and proposed system from [27]. [27] [4] presented a pipelined IEEE floating-point multiplier system which was capable of carrying out either single-precision or double precision multiplication. [4] claims that the latency of the system in single precision operation was 2 cycles while in double-precision operation it was 3 cycles.…”
Section: Double Precision Floating-point Multiplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This delay is significantly less than Booth multiplier. Soumya Havaldar, K S Gurumurthy [4] proposed the design of multiplier for floating point numbers using vedic mathematics. This design also manages overflow, underflow and rounding.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%