2019
DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.b1382.0982s1119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on IEEE 754 Standard Single Precision Floating Point Multipliers Designed using Urdhva Triyagbhyam Sutra of Vedic Mathematics

Abstract: Duplication of the coasting element numbers is the big activity in automated signal handling. So the exhibition of drifting problem multipliers count on a primary undertaking in any computerized plan. Coasting factor numbers are spoken to utilizing IEEE 754 modern day in single precision(32-bits), Double precision(sixty four-bits) and Quadruple precision(128-bits) organizations. Augmentation of those coasting component numbers can be completed via using Vedic generation. Vedic arithmetic encompass sixteen wond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To implement the quantization function in Step 4 [19], the divider must process 24 times to obtain a 24-bits quotient to then obtain a single-precision floating-point, following the single-precision-floating point criterion from IEEE 754 standard single-precision floating-point multipliers designed [21]. The output of the division module is stored in 32 bits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To implement the quantization function in Step 4 [19], the divider must process 24 times to obtain a 24-bits quotient to then obtain a single-precision floating-point, following the single-precision-floating point criterion from IEEE 754 standard single-precision floating-point multipliers designed [21]. The output of the division module is stored in 32 bits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantization method [19] implementation with the single-precision-floating point criterion (IEEE 754) and the proposed quantization division (integer-to-integer) module are compared in Table 1. Table 1 also compares simulation hardware and power resources between Q/IQ division [19] module with [21] and the proposed Q/IQ division module, implemented on Xilinx Kintex-7 XC7K410T. The use of hardware resource and power consumption are reduced by 71.99% and 55.76%, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%