2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)00863-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design optimization and characterization of a small-scale centrifugal cell separator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deeper region allows more milk sample to be contained in a given device area, while the shallower region creates a larger total area of compacted cells for quantitative measurement. Because the centrifugal acceleration can be separated into normal and tangential components at the sloping "floor" (Leatzow et al 2001), the low 5.5°angle keeps the tangential component comparatively small, decreasing the likelihood that cells will become trapped along the sloping floor as they move into the closed-end channel. The V-shaped region of the funnel has a maximum angle of 37°relative to the disc radius, (Walstra et al 1999) possibly larger than ideal for minimizing cell trapping along this region of the side walls, but the sample volume, height of the disc, and radius of the disc constrained this dimensional choice, which proved to be acceptable.…”
Section: Sample Volume and Channel Geometry And Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deeper region allows more milk sample to be contained in a given device area, while the shallower region creates a larger total area of compacted cells for quantitative measurement. Because the centrifugal acceleration can be separated into normal and tangential components at the sloping "floor" (Leatzow et al 2001), the low 5.5°angle keeps the tangential component comparatively small, decreasing the likelihood that cells will become trapped along the sloping floor as they move into the closed-end channel. The V-shaped region of the funnel has a maximum angle of 37°relative to the disc radius, (Walstra et al 1999) possibly larger than ideal for minimizing cell trapping along this region of the side walls, but the sample volume, height of the disc, and radius of the disc constrained this dimensional choice, which proved to be acceptable.…”
Section: Sample Volume and Channel Geometry And Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also likely that some of the cells roll along the wall(s) as they move toward the closed-end channel, decreasing the average settling velocity. Leatzow et al found that small differences in the angles of tapered walls can cause as much as a 6-fold difference in the separation time (Leatzow et al 2001).…”
Section: Somatic Cell Sedimentation Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to calculate the apparent porosity for each species we use the method proposed by Patwardahan and Tien ! , first applied to blood cells by Van Wie and Hustvedt 3 then by Leatzow et al 4 to calculate the average weighted particle diameter ! "# and the porosity of the fluidized bed, assuming that the highest suspended particles indicate the end of the fluidized bed.…”
Section: System Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%