2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing an optimised supply network for sustainable conversion of waste agricultural plastics into higher value products

Abstract: Agricultural plastics are currently characterised by a predominantly linear take-make-dispose value chain, thus being a major stream of waste that contributes to significant environmental and economic issues. Therefore, policy makers have recently indicated the adoption of circular economy approaches as the way forward for plastics. This study addresses the problem of agricultural plastic waste as a major stream of landfilled waste by assessing the potential for recycling the plastic into higher value products… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Refuse (R0) strategy is covered in three articles relating to the production chain level with the following focus: designing for Recycling (DfR) to address bio-based polymers and recycling infrastructure system constraints [ 95 ]; a collaborative value chain for circular business models [ 111 ]; investigations into the structure of potential Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) supply chains to identify bottlenecks (bioplastic) [ 178 ], the role of Reduce (R2) strategy in the optimization of end-to-end supply network design to reduce waste in Scottish agriculture [ 190 ]; and Reuse (R3) strategy in relation to the legacy additives in the plastic waste stream resulting from improper disposal, treatment option and regulation [ 244 ]. Table 10 shown the distribution of literature of circular strategy at the production chain level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Refuse (R0) strategy is covered in three articles relating to the production chain level with the following focus: designing for Recycling (DfR) to address bio-based polymers and recycling infrastructure system constraints [ 95 ]; a collaborative value chain for circular business models [ 111 ]; investigations into the structure of potential Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) supply chains to identify bottlenecks (bioplastic) [ 178 ], the role of Reduce (R2) strategy in the optimization of end-to-end supply network design to reduce waste in Scottish agriculture [ 190 ]; and Reuse (R3) strategy in relation to the legacy additives in the plastic waste stream resulting from improper disposal, treatment option and regulation [ 244 ]. Table 10 shown the distribution of literature of circular strategy at the production chain level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [ 165 ] X Distributed plastic recycling using 3D printer using closed supply chain network. [ 178 ] X X Investigate the structure of potential supply chain of OFMSW to identify bottlenecks (bioplastic) [ 190 ] X X Optimization on end-to-end supply network design to reduce waste in Scotland agriculture. [ 233 ] X Islamabad and Rawalpindi industrial circular plastic consumption cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results showed that high investment cost is required for minimising the environmental impact and risk. Rentizelas et al, (2018) optimised the end-to-end supply chain of agricultural plastic waste recycling. Zhang and Jiang, (2017) developed a model to find the optimal design of the supply chain which is focusing on extraction of biodiesel from waste cooking oil.…”
Section: Operational Efficiency Improvement Practices Applied In Fscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the EU norm, in various member countries, producers are required to organise nonprofit PROs to run the collection of waste derived from goods they produce and trade as a first step for their recycling phase (European Commission, 2014;Lifset & Lindhqvist, 2008). The ability of EPR mechanisms to move the management of waste towards recycling attitudes allowing waste reduction from end-live products is already reported in various works (e.g., Fischer, 2011;Rentizelas, Shpakova, & Mašek, 2018). At present, the use of this specific tool in the EU area refers to a variety of contexts and covers several products such as end-of-life vehicles, batteries, packaging, oils, graphic paper, and waste electrical and electronic equipment (European Commission, 2014).…”
Section: Tions (European Food and Sustainable Consumption And Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%