2010
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2010.5560594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing and deploying a building-wide cognitive radio network testbed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly because its full benefits would require disruptive regulation rules, where spectrum resources would be allocated according to actual needs at a specific location in space and time, rather than ruled by fixed frequency assignments [2]. Therefore, first experimental over-the-air testbeds were restricted to the ISM bands [3][4][5] and/or to the research community [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly because its full benefits would require disruptive regulation rules, where spectrum resources would be allocated according to actual needs at a specific location in space and time, rather than ruled by fixed frequency assignments [2]. Therefore, first experimental over-the-air testbeds were restricted to the ISM bands [3][4][5] and/or to the research community [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several WBAN hardware platforms designed based on CR technology are also developed [12], Currently widely used and studied platforms include the platform developed by Virginia Tech [13], software radio Sora developed by Microsoft research center [14] and wireless open-access research platform (WARP) developed by Rice University [15]. To take the advantage of high performance and high accuracy of channel accessing technology, these platforms emphasize more on the strategy of spectrum sensing and signal processing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chowdhury and Melodia [12] argue that current simulators make several simplifying assumptions concerning the characteristics of real systems, resulting in questionable results. Newman et al [62] also refer that CR research has been mostly limited to theoretical frameworks and simulations, or in few cases to prototypes for small-scale experiments. Theoretical models and simulations enable to achieve a view of what the limits could be, i.e., the performance goals.…”
Section: Validation Of Cr Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experimental tesbeds enable an evaluation and refinement of the models. They provide much more practical results, especially concerning practicality, limitations, and the proof that harmful interference to primary users is avoided [62]. Hence, the existence of experimental platforms and testbeds is highly desirable, and a few proposals already exist, such as the framework presented by Jia and Zhang [36], Iris [63], ORBIT (Open Access Research Testbed for NextGeneration Wireless Networks) [64], and CORNET (CR Network) [62].…”
Section: Validation Of Cr Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%