2016
DOI: 10.14313/jamris_4-2016/28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Social Robots for Interaction at Work: Socio-Cognitive Factors Underlying Intention to Work with Social Robots

Abstract: Abstract:This paper discusses the effects of robot design (machine-like, humanoid, android)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe analogous results for humanuniqueness scale: men had weaker belief in humanuniqueness than women. As BHNU and NATIR scores correlate we may explain this observation along the same lines, suggested in [18,19] and discussed in Section 2.4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We observe analogous results for humanuniqueness scale: men had weaker belief in humanuniqueness than women. As BHNU and NATIR scores correlate we may explain this observation along the same lines, suggested in [18,19] and discussed in Section 2.4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The choice of robots for the study was arbitrary but motivated by previous research, see e.g. [19] and [16], which suggest that Asimo should be evaluated as more friendly and likable than Atlas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…EU Digital Single Market policy. Those concepts are connected to numerous emerging aspects that have been already the subject of the study, including by our interdisciplinary team who explored various modes of interaction between humans, machines, systems and interfaces such as VR, as explored by Kobylinski et al (2019), VA, as in Kowalski et al (2019) and Biele et al (2019), or personal and industry robots, intelligent or smart homes, cities and workplaces as in Piçarra et al (2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%