1996
DOI: 10.1109/54.500196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desing and self-test for switched-current building blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that even in cases where this approximation is not very accurate, (9) can be used to construct a measure of nongaussianity that is consistent in the sense that (9) obtains its minimum value, 0. When x has a Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Entropymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that even in cases where this approximation is not very accurate, (9) can be used to construct a measure of nongaussianity that is consistent in the sense that (9) obtains its minimum value, 0. When x has a Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Entropymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The reported approaches for SI circuits fault diagnosis can basically be divided into two categories: (1) based on DC signal testing technology [6][7][8], they can test the changes of static characteristics in switching current circuit, which cased by MOS malfunctions, such as leakage current changes, export conductance, and voltage transmission characteristics and bias, but cannot test frequency dynamics and distortions characteristics; (2) based on testing phase clock [9][10][11], by changing the clock sequence, divide-by-two circuits are restructured into cascade connected current mirror circuit and then contrast the import and export current signal. During the past few years, there are some literatures discussed testing on the SI circuits including testing principles, test generation as well as BIST [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Among these, the work in [12] propose a pseudorandom testing technique for switching current circuit module without any preprocessing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional analog circuit breakdown models include catastrophic faults(or hardware faults) and parametric faults (or soft faults, parameters of parts change beyond the scope of its safety margin, resulting in unacceptable performance recession). Relatively speaking, catastrophic failure testing is easier [5,6,10] than soft fault testing.…”
Section: Pseudo-random Test Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some literatures discussed testing on the switched current circuits including testing principles, processes, as well as BIST exists. The reported approaches can basically be divided into two categories: (1) Based on DC signal testing technology [2][3][4], they can test the changes of static characteristics in switching current circuit, which cased by MOS malfunctions, such as leakage current changes, export conductance, and voltage transmission characteristics and bias, but cannot test frequency dynamics and distortions characteristics; (2) Based on testing phase clock [5][6][7], by changing the clock sequence, divideby-two circuits are restructured into cascade connected current mirror circuit and then contrast the import and export current signal. The proposed techniques suffer from being applicable only to some specific structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, concerning the testing aspect, the test techniques proposed for analog circuits are not readily applicable to SI circuits. The few papers dedicated to the test of SI circuits principally concern test methodology, test generation, DFT, and BIST [1][2][3][4]. Recently, the concept of implicit functional testing was introduced in [5][6][7][8], these works used pseudorandom approach transferred digital test technology to the analog test, for detection and localization of parametric faults in analog circuits by evaluating different circuit responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%