The internal energy distributions of typical ions generated by desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) were measured using the "survival yield" method, and compared with corresponding data for electrospray ionization (ESI) and electrosonic spray ionization (ESSI). The results show that the three ionization methods produce populations of ions having internal energy distributions of similar shapes and mean values (1.7-1.9 eV) suggesting similar phenomena, at least in the later stages of the process leading from solvated droplets to gas-phase ions. These data on energetics are consistent with the view that DESI involves "droplet pick-up" (liquid-liquid extraction) followed by ESI-like desolvation and gas-phase ion formation. The effects of various experimental parameters on the degree of fragmentation of p-methoxy-benzylpyridinium ions were compared between DESI and ESSI. The results show similar trends in the survival yields as a function of the nebulizing gas pressure, solvent flow rate, and distance from the sprayer tip to the MS inlet. These observations are consistent with the mechanism noted above and they also enable the user to exercise control over the energetics of the DESI ionization process, through manipulation of external and internal ion source parameters. [1, 24, 29 -32], and explosives detection [4,8,[33][34][35][36][37]. Investigations into the fundamentals of the droplet dynamics and ionization mechanism have also been conducted through systematic measurements of the droplet size and velocity [38], computer simulations [39], surface charging effects [40], or more simply, by evaluating the mass spectra of various types of analytes in conjunction with variations in the experimental parameters [41]. These investigations suggested that the primary ionization mechanism in DESI is "droplet pick-up", i.e., extraction of the analyte into the droplet, followed by electrospray ionization (ESI)-like mechanism in which the progeny droplets are desolvated yielding ionized molecules. One of the arguments supporting this conclusion, the similarity between the ESI and DESI mass spectra, also implies that the two ion sources should generate populations of ions with similar internal energy distributions, P(E). It should be noted though, that the initial events in the two experiments are quite different, and recent simulations show that the process of formation of progeny droplets from the initial ϳ4 m droplets in DESI is not dependent on charge build-up as it is in ESI. These dissimilarities need not result in differences in the final internal energy (E) since the later processes occurring in the atmospheric pressure interface are probably the same for these two processes and, as we will show later, dominate the energetics of the process.Here we use the "survival yield" (SY) method [42] applied to a set of thermometer ions (benzylpyridinium cations) to judge internal energy deposition associated with soft ionization techniques [43] to measure and compare the internal energy distributions of the ions generated b...