2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49785-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Malicious Accounts on the Ethereum Blockchain with Supervised Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations. In this paper, we use the labels from Etherscan as our ground truth, similar to previous works [3], [48], [79]. Etherscan is trusted by the community that it has a clear and comprehensive view of the labels, since Etherscan has reliable data sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations. In this paper, we use the labels from Etherscan as our ground truth, similar to previous works [3], [48], [79]. Etherscan is trusted by the community that it has a clear and comprehensive view of the labels, since Etherscan has reliable data sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Security enhancement: Machine learning can provide blockchain with intelligent means of detecting anomalies. In particular, machine learning can be applied to identify attack types and malicious nodes by monitoring and classifying the motives of participants, thus effectively preventing attacks [183]- [186].…”
Section: A Classical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al [65] proposed a supervised machine-learningbased approach to detect malicious accounts in Ethereum. The proposed approach has achieved high scores of detection accuracy of 96.21% and a false positive rate of 3% by analyzing both EOA and contract accounts.…”
Section: F Malicious Account/entities Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%