2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2010.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting object boundaries using low-, mid-, and high-level information

Abstract: Object boundary detection and segmentation is a central problem in computer vision. The importance of combining low-level, mid-level, and high-level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead this alternative view suggests that the bottom-up activation of a loose collection of hardwired feature detectors via a hierarchy of increasing complex processing stages may provide a coarse initial visual representation for more complex routines and several feedforward/feedback iterations to solve specific tasks including edge detection, grouping, figure segregation, and the computation of spatial relations between parts, among others, and more generally the parsing and interpretation of complex visual scenes (see for instance, Hochstein and Ahissar, 2002; Bar, 2004; Zheng et al, 2007; Epshtein et al, 2008; Serre and Poggio, 2010 for a recent review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead this alternative view suggests that the bottom-up activation of a loose collection of hardwired feature detectors via a hierarchy of increasing complex processing stages may provide a coarse initial visual representation for more complex routines and several feedforward/feedback iterations to solve specific tasks including edge detection, grouping, figure segregation, and the computation of spatial relations between parts, among others, and more generally the parsing and interpretation of complex visual scenes (see for instance, Hochstein and Ahissar, 2002; Bar, 2004; Zheng et al, 2007; Epshtein et al, 2008; Serre and Poggio, 2010 for a recent review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological insight is also considered to obtain invariance under various viewing conditions [10]. Other studies propose combining different levels (low -mid -high) of information [11]. The second step of the object recognition pipeline has also been widely addressed.…”
Section: A Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, scene-level matching with global image descriptors is followed by SP level matching of mid-level features. The study in [11] addresses the low-, mid-, and high-level cues. Individual classifiers are trained on different levels of descriptors and classification outputs are combined for the final decision.…”
Section: B Mid-level Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR) and performance measures approximating the AUC-PR including R-precision, average precision, and 11-point interpolated average precision also gained increasing attention [9], [10]. These performance measures have been widely used in diverse fields such as computer vision [11], computational biology [12], [13], information retrieval [14], medicine [15], and natural language processing [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%