2000
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(20000601)21:10<2080::aid-elps2080>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of a urinary biomaker for oxidative DNA damage 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection

Abstract: Abstract8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) is present in urine as a result of oxidative DNA damage associated with age-related diseases such as cancer. In this report a method is presented for the detection of 8-OHdG in human morning urine utilizing capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection (CEEC). The limit of detection for a aqueous standard of 8-OHdG is 50 nM (signal to noise ratio S/N = 3). A single solid-phase extraction (SPE) step with a C18 column is used for sample cleanup and 20-fold prec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that when E d was 0.45 V, the working electrode showed a good stability and high reproducibility. The results agreed well with previous report by off-column CE-AD [31].…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Voltammogramsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that when E d was 0.45 V, the working electrode showed a good stability and high reproducibility. The results agreed well with previous report by off-column CE-AD [31].…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Voltammogramsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The limit of detection for an aqueous standard of 8OHdG was 4.3 nM (signal-to-noise ratio S/N = 3), which was 10-folds lower than that of the off-column CE-AD method reported by Weiss [31] (50 nM) and almost five-folds lower than that of our previous study [43] (20 nM) for analyzing 8OHdG. Since the concentration of a urine sample was increased 20-folds after the SPE step, the limit of detection for a urine sample was 0.22 nM.…”
Section: Reproducibility Limit Of Detection and Linear Rangementioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The limit of detection for an aqueous standard of 8-OHdG was 4.3 nM (S/N = 3), which was 10-fold lower than that of the off-column CE-AD method reported by Weiss and Lunte [25] (50 nM) and almost five-fold lower than that of our previous study [24] (20 nM) for analyzing 8-OHdG. Since the concentration of a urine sample was increased 20-fold after the SPE step, the limit of detection for a urine sample was 0.22 nM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%