1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90782-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infection in asymptomatic and symptomatic women: Comparison of deoxribonucleic acid probe test with tissue culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PCR has proven to be more sensitive and specific than conventional microbiologic assays. 4,23 The highly sensitive PCR is, therefore, a valuable tool for studying the prevalence of asymptomatic C trachomatis infections since these infections are often associated with low copy numbers of C trachomatis. 11 To facilitate large prevalence studies, our aim was to detect C trachomatis DNA by PCR in crude cell suspensions of cervical scrapes in symptomatic women attending a gynecologic outpatient department and in a randomly selected population of urban slum dwellers.…”
Section: Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR has proven to be more sensitive and specific than conventional microbiologic assays. 4,23 The highly sensitive PCR is, therefore, a valuable tool for studying the prevalence of asymptomatic C trachomatis infections since these infections are often associated with low copy numbers of C trachomatis. 11 To facilitate large prevalence studies, our aim was to detect C trachomatis DNA by PCR in crude cell suspensions of cervical scrapes in symptomatic women attending a gynecologic outpatient department and in a randomly selected population of urban slum dwellers.…”
Section: Cytologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eine Sensitivität von 93% und eine Spezifität von 98% [18]. Ähnlich günstige Nachweisquoten wurden der Untersuchung mit der DNA-Sonde von anderen Autoren attestiert [17,39]; sie ist mittlerweise im diagnostischen Alltag etabliert [5].…”
Section: Mono-und Mehrfachinfektionenunclassified
“…T he use of cell culture systems for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis is the gold standard. 1 However, the sensitivity of a single endocervical specimen may be only 70-90. [2][3] Unfortunately, cell culture is labor intensive and requires 48 hours for completion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%