2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2757104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of surface brush on biological cells in vitro with atomic force microscopy

Abstract: Observation of a brush on the cell surface with the atomic force microscopy ͑AFM͒ in vitro is reported. The number of methods to study brushes that coat living cells is limited despite their biological importance. Moreover, it is important to take into account the brush layer when studying cell mechanics. Here the authors present an AFM method to detect the length and grafting density of the brush on viable cells with resolution that considerably surpasses any existing method. The authors demonstrate this meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
132
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the Young's modulus of the cell is not constant over the whole range of indentation. The same observations were made by Kasas et al and by Sokolov et al while indenting COS cells [32] and human cervical epithelial cells [61], respectively. These authors considered the cell as a mechanically multilayered structure in which the first layer (the most superficial) represents the actin cytoskeleton [32] or molecular brushes (microvilli, microridges, glycocalyx) [61], and the second layer represents the intermediate filament and microtubule network or "bulky cytosol".…”
Section: Hertz Modelsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the Young's modulus of the cell is not constant over the whole range of indentation. The same observations were made by Kasas et al and by Sokolov et al while indenting COS cells [32] and human cervical epithelial cells [61], respectively. These authors considered the cell as a mechanically multilayered structure in which the first layer (the most superficial) represents the actin cytoskeleton [32] or molecular brushes (microvilli, microridges, glycocalyx) [61], and the second layer represents the intermediate filament and microtubule network or "bulky cytosol".…”
Section: Hertz Modelsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The same observations were made by Kasas et al and by Sokolov et al while indenting COS cells [32] and human cervical epithelial cells [61], respectively. These authors considered the cell as a mechanically multilayered structure in which the first layer (the most superficial) represents the actin cytoskeleton [32] or molecular brushes (microvilli, microridges, glycocalyx) [61], and the second layer represents the intermediate filament and microtubule network or "bulky cytosol". It is likely that in our experiments also that the 'membrane zone' (membrane ruffles, cortical actin cytoskeleton, lipid bilayer, membrane proteins) accounts for the first linear slope (E 1 ) and that the second slope (E 2 ) is caused by the elasticity of the bulky cytosol (microtubule network, intermediate filament network, cell organelles).…”
Section: Hertz Modelsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As was shown in [52], it is critically important to take into account the pericellular coat for proper determination of biophysical properties of cells in the AFM indentation experiments. While the presence of the pericellular layer is well known, its nontrivial contribution to cell mechanics has only recently been confirmed [6, 47, 48, 53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various membrane protrusions, which can be seen in optical confocal microscopy (see, e.g., 20 ) can be detected with AFM 33 . It has recently been found that the pericellular brush interferes with indentation measurements of elastic properties of the cell body, and a new model must be used 34 which separates contribution of the pericellular brush layer and deformation of the cell body in the AFM indentation experiments. Interestingly, cancer cells may look artificially softer if the cellular brush is not taken into account as was shown for the case of human cervical epithelial cells 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%