2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of the optic disc in fundus images by combining probability models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various other techniques such as sliding window technique [ 91 ], Multi Resolution Gabor Transform [ 115 ], Gaussian kernels [ 144 ], intensity-based techniques [ 66 , 79 ], statistical classifier [ 5 , 61 ], Principal Component Analysis (PCA) [ 46 , 67 ], Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Semantic Image Transformation (SIT) [ 24 ], entropy-based backtracking approach [ 63 ], ON detection algorithm [ 133 ], deformable models [ 88 , 100 ] and Locally Statistical Active Contour Model with the Structure Prior (LSACM-SP) approach [ 146 ] are also used to accomplish the purpose of feature segmentation and extraction, for DR detection. DR classification is performed using Clustering [ 5 , 46 , 51 , 88 , 91 , 116 , 145 ], ensemble techniques [ 13 , 14 , 18 , 141 ], SVM [ 22 , 63 , 108 ], Sparse Representation Classifier (SRC) [ 71 ], Neural Networks [ 42 , 68 , 85 , 126 , 135 ], Random Forest Classifier (RFC) [ 61 , 62 , 125 ], SVM based hybrid classifier [ 5 ], Majority Voting (MV ) [ 53 ] etc. Supervised classification techniques such as KNN classification [ 37 , 93 ], Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Naive Bayes (NB) [ 17 ], Bayesian classifier [ 55 ], cascade Adaboost CNN classifier [ 8 ], Naïve–Bayes and Decision Tree (DT) C4.5 enhanced with bagging techniques [ 46 ], etc.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Dr Using MLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various other techniques such as sliding window technique [ 91 ], Multi Resolution Gabor Transform [ 115 ], Gaussian kernels [ 144 ], intensity-based techniques [ 66 , 79 ], statistical classifier [ 5 , 61 ], Principal Component Analysis (PCA) [ 46 , 67 ], Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Semantic Image Transformation (SIT) [ 24 ], entropy-based backtracking approach [ 63 ], ON detection algorithm [ 133 ], deformable models [ 88 , 100 ] and Locally Statistical Active Contour Model with the Structure Prior (LSACM-SP) approach [ 146 ] are also used to accomplish the purpose of feature segmentation and extraction, for DR detection. DR classification is performed using Clustering [ 5 , 46 , 51 , 88 , 91 , 116 , 145 ], ensemble techniques [ 13 , 14 , 18 , 141 ], SVM [ 22 , 63 , 108 ], Sparse Representation Classifier (SRC) [ 71 ], Neural Networks [ 42 , 68 , 85 , 126 , 135 ], Random Forest Classifier (RFC) [ 61 , 62 , 125 ], SVM based hybrid classifier [ 5 ], Majority Voting (MV ) [ 53 ] etc. Supervised classification techniques such as KNN classification [ 37 , 93 ], Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Naive Bayes (NB) [ 17 ], Bayesian classifier [ 55 ], cascade Adaboost CNN classifier [ 8 ], Naïve–Bayes and Decision Tree (DT) C4.5 enhanced with bagging techniques [ 46 ], etc.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Dr Using MLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this model is highly dependent on preprocessing steps and algorithm parameters. Some other CAD algorithms have been developed based on the geometrical principle for OD segmentation with higher accuracy, such as the Hough circle cloud [28], ensemble of probability models [29], sliding band filter [30], and active contour models [31,32]. In a previous study [28], a fully automated software called Hough circle cloud was developed for OD localization.…”
Section: Optic Disc and Cup Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the software was tested on a small dataset and was implemented on powerful graphical processing units (GPUs) instead of local computers. The system proposed in [29] addressed the strengths of different object detection methods for OD segmentation. The authors achieved an accuracy of 98.91%.…”
Section: Optic Disc and Cup Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the deformable model-based approaches, they exploit the specific characteristics of the OD. Harangi et al [19] proposed a model based on the combination of probability models in order to detect the OD and its boundaries. Furthermore, they increased the accuracy of the method using axiomatic and Bayesian approximations.…”
Section: Optic Disk Detection Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%