2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/3565238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterioration of Health‐Related Quality of Life Scores under Treatment Predicts Longer Survival

Abstract: Objectives. Baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores predict survival, which has already been demonstrated in various studies. However, we were interested in whether changes in baseline scores during treatment are also significant predictors of survival. Methods and Materials. We analysed the data of 400 consecutive cancer patients receiving radiochemotherapy. Leading diagnoses were head and neck cancer (34.5%), rectal cancer (24.5%), and lung cancer (13%). HRQoL was studied at baseline, six week… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, patients who were taking fewer steps did report greater reductions in their QoL, and we found that a simple cut point (average reduction in 1,000 daily steps from the previous week) was sufficient to highlight this at-risk cohort. Since pretreatment and post-treatment QoL outcomes do predict for survival following head and neck chemoradiotherapy, [12][13][14] there may be a place for WD to monitor patients, especially after treatment when they are not interacting with the health care system on a daily basis. Indeed, remote monitoring of patient activity may work in concert with telemedicine to manage patients after radiotherapy in a cost-effective manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, patients who were taking fewer steps did report greater reductions in their QoL, and we found that a simple cut point (average reduction in 1,000 daily steps from the previous week) was sufficient to highlight this at-risk cohort. Since pretreatment and post-treatment QoL outcomes do predict for survival following head and neck chemoradiotherapy, [12][13][14] there may be a place for WD to monitor patients, especially after treatment when they are not interacting with the health care system on a daily basis. Indeed, remote monitoring of patient activity may work in concert with telemedicine to manage patients after radiotherapy in a cost-effective manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the identification of irAE is essential for the patients' safety. There exists a mild correlation between a reduction of quality of life during radiochemotherapy and prolonged survival, which is probably a marker for treatment intensity [36]. However, in case of the occurrence of irAE, ICI treatment frequently has to be stopped and irAE management has to be started.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also an evaluation of the physical component summary (PCS) with four subcomponents (physical functioning, physical limitations, bodily pain, and general health); and a mental component summary (MCS) with four subcomponents (vitality, social functioning, emotional limitations, and mental health). The quality of life (HRQoL) of the subjects was considered to be good if the SF-36 score was above the median value, and to be poor if the score was under the median value for SF-36 total score, SF-36 PCS, and SF-36 MCS as well as each of the subcomponents [9], [10], [11].…”
Section: Hrqolmentioning
confidence: 99%