2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of subjective patient-reported quality of vision after small-incision lenticule extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the present study did not reveal any relevant coherence between SMILE-induced HOAs with subjectively reported visual quality as assessed with the QOV questionnaire, a validated PRO instrument gauging: overall visual symptom frequency, severity and bothering effect (McAlinden et al 2010). In contrast, statistically significance was found for associations between corneal HOAs and three of the six most commonly reported (Schmelter et al 2019). Visual symptoms after SMILE.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the present study did not reveal any relevant coherence between SMILE-induced HOAs with subjectively reported visual quality as assessed with the QOV questionnaire, a validated PRO instrument gauging: overall visual symptom frequency, severity and bothering effect (McAlinden et al 2010). In contrast, statistically significance was found for associations between corneal HOAs and three of the six most commonly reported (Schmelter et al 2019). Visual symptoms after SMILE.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…The most commonly reported visual symptoms were fluctuation in vision and glare: a cumulative of 73.3% and 65.5% of patients reported these symptoms either ‘occasionally’, ‘quite often’ or ‘very often’. Fluctuation in vision and glare was also concordantly perceived as the most severe and the most bothersome postoperative visual disturbances (Schmelter et al 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21,23 Many studies have explored the relationship between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical parameters. [30][31][32][33] Although the relationship seems complex, PROs have been proved to be an effective measure of visual function in patients. The IND-VFQ-31-CN and IND-VFQ-GF-19-CN scores are both weakly correlated to visual acuity, consistent with our previous research about other instruments, 34,35 indicating that PROs and visual acuity were inter-related and mutually complementary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%