2018
DOI: 10.4136/ambi-agua.2196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of carbamazepine and diazepam by SPE-HPLC-DAD in Belém River water, Curitiba-PR/Brazil

Abstract: This work sought to determine the two psychotropic drugs most commonly released by Psychosocial Care Centers (CAPS) into urban river waters (Belém sub-basin, Curitiba, PR, Brazil). A simple analytical method using SPE followed by a HPLC-DAD was developed and validated. Strata-X® cartridges were used to extract (carbamazepine) CZ and diazepam (DZ) from water and SPE conditions were optimized by 2 3 factorial design. The validated method was specific for target compounds; correlation coefficients were above 0.99… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stock solutions of diazepam or duloxetine were prepared by dissolving diazepam in DMF. On the basis of the environmental concentration (diazepam, 0.763 µg/L; duloxetine, 0.08 µg/L in the effluent; Böger et al, 2018; Osawa et al, 2019), we set up five test concentrations for each exposure test (diazepam: solvent control, 0.8, 4, 20, and 100 µg/L; duloxetine: solvent control, 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, and 12.5 µg/L). One milliliter of a stock solution was added to 18 L of dechlorinated water and mixed well using a glass rod to achieve the test concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stock solutions of diazepam or duloxetine were prepared by dissolving diazepam in DMF. On the basis of the environmental concentration (diazepam, 0.763 µg/L; duloxetine, 0.08 µg/L in the effluent; Böger et al, 2018; Osawa et al, 2019), we set up five test concentrations for each exposure test (diazepam: solvent control, 0.8, 4, 20, and 100 µg/L; duloxetine: solvent control, 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, and 12.5 µg/L). One milliliter of a stock solution was added to 18 L of dechlorinated water and mixed well using a glass rod to achieve the test concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, to represent “expert choice” and include an element of (perceived) risk to the environment, the literature was reviewed to determine which pharmaceutical micropollutants had been monitored in the rivers of the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba and to identify the minimum and maximum concentrations for these compounds. It was established that only 27 compounds from 9 different classes (hormones, antihypertensives, anti inflammatories, analgesics, psychotropics, metabolites, lipid regulators, stimulants, and food and cosmetic preservatives) (Ide et al 2013; Kramer et al 2015; Osawa et al 2015; Böger et al 2018; Barcellos et al 2019a) had been monitored in this region. Several shortcomings to this first approach are acknowledged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage recoveries in this study are detailed Table S3 as calculated using standard approach from literature (Wardenier, 2016). Literature shows the acceptable range for the recovery of CBZ in the water at 80%-120% (Böger et al, 2018;Krause et al, 2011;Miao & Metcalfe, 2003).…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%