Determination of discomfort glare criteria for daylit space in Indonesia

Mangkuto, Rizki A.; Kurnia, K.A.; Azizah, Dovi Nurdiana; Atmodipoero, R. Triyogo; Soelami, F.X. Nugroho

doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.010

Cited by 37 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To provide basis for guidelines/standards for IEQ such as lighting design [78][79][80][81] or to test the existing green building standards [82,83] Evaluate…”

Section: Impact Standard/criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review

Froese

Brager

2018

Building and Environment

250

230

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is a process of evaluating the performance of a building after it has been occupied for at least several years. The authors conducted a comprehensive and critical review to provide a both qualitative and quantitative introduction of POE, including a brief introduction of the history, definition and benefits of POE, a statistical analysis of 146 POE projects since 2010, a comparison of 13 existing POE protocols, a summary of emerging research focuses, and potential future research areas. The 146 POE projects were analyzed in terms of building types, countries, purposes, methods used, and key findings. The review of 13 POE 2 protocols show the state-of-the-practice POE techniques. Apart from POE projects, the authors present emerging research topics related to the visualization of POE results, analyses of occupant survey database, and measurement of occupancy. Finally, the discussion summarizes the current condition of POE research and proposes five transitions that POE efforts should pursue: from

show abstract

“…To provide basis for guidelines/standards for IEQ such as lighting design [78][79][80][81] or to test the existing green building standards [82,83] Evaluate…”

Section: Impact Standard/criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review

Froese

Brager

2018

Building and Environment

250

230

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Their results indicate that the models generally underestimate discomfort glare that is perceived by occupants in real office environments (Hirning, 2014, Mangkuto, 2017. As an example, the DGP value representative of 50% of participants being disturbed by discomfort glare in field studies was evaluated as 0.2 (Hirning, 2014) or 0.24 (Mangkuto, 2017). However, from a meta-analysis study combining results from seven laboratory studies (Wienold, 2019), the DGP value derived as the cut-off value between noticeable and disturbing glare was 0.38.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, the cut-off values for the Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) index, of which the scale ranges from 0 to 1, are defined (Reinhart, 2011) as: Through field studies, researchers have attempted to validate these daylight discomfort glare models and their corresponding cut-off values. Their results indicate that the models generally underestimate discomfort glare that is perceived by occupants in real office environments (Hirning, 2014, Mangkuto, 2017. As an example, the DGP value representative of 50% of participants being disturbed by discomfort glare in field studies was evaluated as 0.2 (Hirning, 2014) or 0.24 (Mangkuto, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discomfort Glare Cut-Off Values From Field and Laboratory Studies

Pierson

Khanie

Bodart

et al. 2019

PROCEEDINGS OF the 29th Quadrennial Session of the CIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the application of discomfort glare metrics, a categorisation is used, dividing the metric scale into categories of perception. These categories are separated by borderline values, or so-called cut-off values. Recent literature shows that these cut-off values are lower when they are derived from field study data than those derived from laboratory study data. To investigate this further, the data from one field study and two laboratory studies was used to derive and compare cut-off values corresponding to three borderlines. The results show that the field study cut-off values were systematically lower than the laboratory study ones, implying that discomfort glare is reported at lower stimulus magnitudes in the field. Although further research is required on that topic, several hypotheses are discussed in order to explain the gap between cut-off values derived from field data and cut-off values derived from laboratory data. Recommendations for future studies are also provided.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, (Feriadi & Wong, 2004) considered windows as a means of applying adaptive thermal comfort in Indonesian buildings. In contrast, in terms of visual comfort, Mangkuto attempted to determine the appropriate criteria for discomfort glare in Indonesia by using windows as glare sources for the occupants (Mangkuto, Kurnia, Azizah, Atmodipoero, & Soelami, 2017). Despite the above examples, little research has focussed on noise transmission from outdoor sources into buildings through openings, that is, windows or vents.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%